Trial reportBMC pulmonary medicine2025
Efficacy and safety of medroxyprogesterone acetate on noninvasive ventilation -treated exacerbated COPD patients: a double-blind randomized clinical trial.
Trial report in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn acute exacerbation periods of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), patients may experience hypoxemia or hypercapnia. Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) and respiratory stimulant drugs are used to treat this condition. Medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) can cross the blood-brain barrier and cause breathing stimulation and hyperventilation. This study was conducted to investigate the effectiveness of MPA in hypercapnic exacerbated COPD patients and the possibility of faster weaning of patients from NIV. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis double-blind clinical trial was conducted on consecutive exacerbated COD patients referred to Shahid Rahnemoun Hospital, Yazd, Iran, from February 2022 to August 2022. Through a block randomized sampling method with a 1:1 allocation ratio, 58 eligible patients with hypercapnic exacerbated COPD on NIV were divided into two study groups: the intervention (treated with MPA 10 mg every 8 h) and the control (treated with placebo). The clinical and arterial blood gas (ABG) parameters were investigated in both groups.
resultsOut of 50 patients, 27 and 23 intervention and control arms cases were analyzed. Although there was a significant difference in the amount of ABG parameters during the study in each group, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. Also, There was no significant difference in the total weaning rate of the patients in the two groups. Despite the higher number of early weaning in the MPA group, no significant difference was reported between the two groups in this regard. In addition, there was no difference between the two groups in the rate of ICU hospitalization, the length of stay of hospitalization and ICU, and the mortality rate.
conclusionThe administration of MPA has not improved clinical and laboratory results, and MPA is not superior to placebo in the weaning process of patients undergoing NIV.
trial registrationIRCT20190810044500N21 (01/02/2022), (https//irct.behdasht.gov.ir/user/trial/59402/view).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.