Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40065251›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of emergency medicine2025

Clinical and demographic profiling of snakebite envenomation in a tertiary care centre in northern India.

Parvathy Sasidharan, Nidhi Kaeley, Prakash Mahala, Jewel Rani Jose, Takshak Shankar, Silpa Santhalingan, Ankit Sharma, Balwant Kumar, Mallapu Ajay Kumar, Minakshi Dhar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Masked peril: acute kidney injury in snakebite victims.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Parvathy SasidharanAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, India.
Nidhi KaeleyAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, India. nidhi.em@aiimsrishikesh.edu.in.
Prakash MahalaAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, India.
Jewel Rani JoseAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, India.
Takshak ShankarAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, India.
Silpa SanthalinganAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Ankit SharmaAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, India.
Balwant KumarAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, India.
Mallapu Ajay KumarAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, India.
Minakshi DharAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSnake bites are a major cause of emergency visits in tropical countries like India, with actual mortality and morbidity likely higher due to underreporting. The aim of the study was to analyze the clinical and demographic profiles of snake bites at the Department of Emergency Medicine, AIIMS Rishikesh, over two years (July 2021 to July 2023).

methodsPatients aged over 18 with witnessed or suspected snake bites were included. Data on demographics, clinical history, laboratory parameters, treatment, and outcomes were collected.

resultsMost patients were male (68.3%) and aged 31-50 years (35.6%). Farmers made up 57.4% of the cohort. Bites occurred mostly in the evening (46.5%) and during the monsoon (71.3%). Symptoms varied: 48.5% were asymptomatic, 31.7% had hemotoxic symptoms, and 15.8% experienced neurotoxic symptoms, including ptosis. Hemotoxic bites frequently involved bleeding at the bite site (93.8%) and gum bleeding (46.9%). Local complications were noted in 7.9% of cases. Neuroparalytic bites required ventilatory support in 62.5%. Blood products were administered to 31% of patients with hemotoxic bites, hemodialysis to 19%, and plasmapheresis and hyperbaric oxygen therapy to 6.3%. Out of the 69 symptomatic patients (68.3%) who received anti-snake venom (ASV), 28 (40.6%) patients developed adverse reactions.

conclusionThis study provides a detailed analysis of suspected snakebites in Uttarakhand and surrounding areas, highlighting the importance of early recognition, prompt treatment, and timely referral to prevent fatalities. The administration of anti-snake venom (ASV) is identified as the most critical intervention, though lack of awareness in rural areas complicates management. The study calls for targeted public health campaigns to educate communities about early snakebite recognition and the role of ASV. It also stresses the need for region-specific protocols and improved healthcare access, emphasizing the importance of referral systems for advanced interventions like hemodialysis and intubation. Overall, the study advocates for enhanced public awareness and healthcare infrastructure to reduce snakebite incidence and mortality in rural populations.

Indexed as

ASVHBOTHemotoxicNeurotoxicPlasmapheresisSnake bite

Identifiers

PMID40065251
PMCPMC11892126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.