ArticleInternational journal of emergency medicine2025
A comparison of outcomes between transferred patients versus patients who presented directly to the emergency department with necrotizing fasciitis.
Article in International journal of emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionNecrotizing Fasciitis (NF) is a rare life-threatening bacterial infection that necessitates emergent resuscitation and operative intervention. Most of the literature has emphasized the need for early surgical intervention. This is problematic for patients being treated at a facility lacking surgical support, with concerns for increasing mortality and morbidity rates.
methodsThis is a 10-year retrospective study of emergency department (ED) documentation and surgical operative reports of patients seen at Arrowhead Regional Medical Center from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2020. The patients were divided into two groups: the Transfer Group (TG), consisting of those transferred from another facility, and the Direct Admit Group (DAG), comprising those who presented directly to the ED. A comparison was conducted to identify statistically significant differences between the 2 groups of patients with a final diagnosis of NF, with specific emphasis on mortality rate, hospital length of stay (LOS), and intensive care unit (ICU) LOS.
resultsA total of 134 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of NF were included in the final analysis. More than half (50.8%, n = 68) of the patients presented as transfers from area hospitals. Compared to the DAG, the TG had a significantly higher percentage of patients undergoing surgical intervention within six hours of ED presentation (95.6% vs. 10.6%, respectively; p < 0.0001). The TG had a lower mortality rate compared to the DAG (11.8% vs. 22.7%), though the difference did not reach statistical significance. There was no statistically significant difference in hospital LOS (13 days vs. 13.5 days, p = 0.9046) or ICU LOS (3 days for both groups, p = 0.4845) between these two groups.
conclusionAggressive management with broad-spectrum antibiotics and intravenous fluid resuscitation may mitigate the effect on mortality in patients with necrotizing fasciitis when prompt surgical intervention is not available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.