Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40065133›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2025

Towards a universal understanding of sex ratio in termites.

Simon Hellemans, Thomas Bourguignon, Yves Roisin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Simon HellemansOkinawa Institute of Science & Technology Graduate University, Okinawa, Japan. simon.hellemans@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1266-9134
Thomas BourguignonOkinawa Institute of Science & Technology Graduate University, Okinawa, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4035-8977
Yves RoisinEvolutionary Biology & Ecology, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6635-3552

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Termites are eusocial cockroaches whose altruist caste is constituted of males and females. While sex ratio theory predicts a balanced investment between sexes in diploid organisms, extreme deviations are observed in termites, both in altruists and alate reproductives. Here, we expand the theoretical framework for the prediction of alate population sex ratio by considering partitioned sexual and parthenogenetic reproduction, and female/male relatedness asymmetries arising from their sex-linked chromosome complexes. We consider the viewpoint of either the primary reproductives or the altruists while accounting for the effect of caste developmental systems on the sex ratio. We compile all data on alate sex ratios available to date (97 species), and found the direction of the sex ratio bias to be consistent within major taxonomic groups. We test our models, along with models of intrasexual competition, on an exploratory set of 13 species with available demographic data. Our analyses indicate that the factors explaining bias in alate sex ratio are variable and include sexual dimorphism, sex-asymmetric inbreeding, imperfect use of sexual and parthenogenetic reproduction, sex-linked genomic inheritance, intrasexual competition and caste developmental constraints. Our study provides an integrative framework for sex ratio and conflicts in termites, and closes in on a universal theory.

Indexed as

IsopteraSex RatioAnimalsFemaleMaleParthenogenesisReproductionSex Characteristics

Identifiers

PMID40065133
PMCPMC11894146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.