Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40065130›Full record

ReviewNPJ digital medicine2025

Ethical considerations in AI for child health and recommendations for child-centered medical AI.

Seo Yi Chng, Mark Jun Wen Tern, Yung Seng Lee, Lionel Tim-Ee Cheng, Jeevesh Kapur, Johan Gunnar Eriksson, Yap Seng Chong, Julian Savulescu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NPJ digital medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Seo Yi ChngKrsyma Medical AI Pte Ltd, Singapore, Singapore. drchngsy@krsyma.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8216-4022
Mark Jun Wen TernSt Helens and Knowsley NHS Foundation Trust, Merseyside, England.
Yung Seng LeeDepartment of Paediatrics, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1253-0557
Lionel Tim-Ee ChengDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Jeevesh KapurDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Johan Gunnar ErikssonSingapore Institute for Clinical Sciences (SICS), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A∗ STAR), Singapore, Singapore.
Yap Seng ChongSingapore Institute for Clinical Sciences (SICS), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A∗ STAR), Singapore, Singapore.
Julian SavulescuCentre for Biomedical Ethics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There does not exist any previous comprehensive review on AI ethics in child health or any guidelines for management, unlike in adult medicine. This review describes ethical principles in AI for child health and provides recommendations for child-centered medical AI. We also introduce the Pediatrics EthicAl Recommendations List for AI (PEARL-AI) framework for clinicians and AI developers to ensure ethical AI enabled systems in healthcare for children.

Identifiers

PMID40065130
PMCPMC11893894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.