Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40065124›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Widely accessible prognostication using medical history for fetal growth restriction and small for gestational age in nationwide insured women.

Herdiantri Sufriyana, Fariska Zata Amani, Aufar Zimamuz Zaman Al Hajiri, Yu-Wei Wu, Emily Chia-Yu Su

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Herdiantri SufriyanaInstitute of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, 155 Section 2 Linong Street, Taipei, 112304, Taiwan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9178-0222
Fariska Zata AmaniDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Surabaya, 57 Raya Jemursari Road, Surabaya, 60237, Indonesia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8887-0304
Aufar Zimamuz Zaman Al HajiriFaculty of Medicine, Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Surabaya, 57 Raya Jemursari Road, Surabaya, 60237, Indonesia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2302-1640
Yu-Wei WuGraduate Institute of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University, 250 Wu-Xing Street, Taipei, 11031, Taiwan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5603-1194
Emily Chia-Yu SuInstitute of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, 155 Section 2 Linong Street, Taipei, 112304, Taiwan. emilysu@nycu.edu.tw.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4801-5159

Funding

Lembaga Pendidikan, Penelitian, dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat (LPPM) Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Surabaya, Indonesia 161.4/UNUSA/Adm-LPPM/III/2021Ministry of Education DP2-111-21121-01-A-05Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan MOST110-2628-E-038-001National Science and Technology Council NSTC111-2811-E-038-003-MY2National Science and Technology Council NSTC113-2221-E-A49-193-MY3The University System of Taipei Joint Research Program USTP-NTOU-TMU-112-04
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prevention of fetal growth restriction/small for gestational age (FGR/SGA) is adequate if screening is accurate. Ultrasound and biomarkers can achieve this goal; however, both are often inaccessible. This study aimed to develop, validate, and deploy a prognostic prediction model for screening FGR/SGA using only medical history. From a nationwide health insurance database (n = 1,697,452), we retrospectively selected visits to 22,024 healthcare providers of primary, secondary, and tertiary care. This study used machine learning (including deep learning) to develop prediction models using 54 medical-history predictors. After evaluating model calibration, clinical utility, and explainability, we selected the best by discrimination ability. We also externally validated the models using geographical and temporal splits of ~ 20% of the selected visits. The models were also compared with those from previous studies, which were rigorously selected by a systematic review of Pubmed, Scopus, and Web of Science. We selected 169,746 subjects with 507,319 visits for predictive modeling from the database, which were 12-to-55-year-old female insurance holders who used the healthcare services. The best prediction model was a deep-insight visible neural network. It had an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of 0.742 (95% confidence interval 0.734 to 0.750) and a sensitivity of 49.09% (95% confidence interval 47.60-50.58% using a threshold with 95% specificity). The model was competitive against the previous models of 30 eligible studies of 381 records, including those using either ultrasound or biomarker measurements. We deployed a web application to apply the model. Our model used only medical history to improve accessibility for FGR/SGA screening. However, future studies are warranted to evaluate if this model's usage impacts patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Fetal Growth RetardationInfant, Small for Gestational AgeAdolescentAdultChildDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornInsurance, HealthMachine LearningMiddle AgedPregnancyPrognosisRetrospective StudiesROC CurveDeep learningElectronic health recordsFetal growth restrictionMachine learningRisk predictionSmall for gestational age

Identifiers

PMID40065124
PMCPMC11894118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.