Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40065089›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Impact of delayed amputation on clinical outcomes compared to that of early amputation in patients with blunt polytrauma.

Jinjoo Kim, Wanseon Choi, Wontae Cho, Jonghwan Moon

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jinjoo KimDivision of Trauma Surgery, Department of Surgery, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea.
Wanseon ChoiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea.
Wontae ChoDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea.
Jonghwan MoonDivision of Trauma Surgery, Department of Surgery, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea. soyo1226@naver.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Delayed amputation after failed limb salvage can lead to negative clinical and functional outcomes due to complications, including re-amputation. This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes and identify risk factors according to the timing of amputation. A retrospective review of lower-extremity injuries managed between January 2016 and December 2022 at a level 1 trauma center was conducted. Outcomes were compared between early amputation (within 48 h) and delayed amputation (beyond 48 h) groups. The primary outcome was the risk of a more proximal amputation level according to the timing of amputation. Secondary outcomes included trauma-related complications and clinical outcomes. Trauma-related complications were more common in the delayed amputation group, with no significant differences in 30-day mortality. Delayed amputation and deep surgical infection at the stump site were associated with higher odds of a more proximal amputation level than initially predicted. The overall hospital stay was significantly longer in the delayed amputation group. While there is no established standard for deciding between limb salvage and amputation strategies, delayed amputation could be a risk factor for shorter limb stumps owing to re-amputation, and patients may experience more trauma-related complications and prolonged hospitalization.

Indexed as

Amputation, SurgicalMultiple TraumaWounds, NonpenetratingAdultFemaleHumansLength of StayLimb SalvageMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTime FactorsTrauma CentersTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID40065089
PMCPMC11894110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.