ArticleScientific reports2025
Risk factors and an optimized prediction model for urosepsis in diabetic patients with upper urinary tract stones.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predicting SIRS after PCNL using machine learning: the joint impact of sarcopenia and staghorn stones.World journal of urology · 2026Article
- Explainable machine learning algorithms for preoperative risk stratification of urosepsis after retrograde intrarenal surgery.Urolithiasis · 2026Article
- Distinct landscapes of T-cell immunity and TCR repertoire between sepsis and pre-septic high-risk states.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Precision diagnosis of preoperative infection in urolithiasis: integrating targeted next-generation sequencing for enhanced accuracy-a multicenter cohort study.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To identify independent risk factors for urosepsis in diabetic patients with upper urinary tract stones (UUTS) and develop a prediction model to facilitate early detection and diagnosis, we retrospectively reviewed medical records of patients admitted between January 2020 and June 2023. Patients were divided based on the quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis was used for variable selection to form a preliminary model. The model was optimized and validated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, the Hosmer-Lemeshow test and calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA). A nomogram was constructed for visualization. A total of 434 patients were enrolled, with 66 cases and 368 controls. Six optimal predictors were identified: underweight, sarcopenia, poor performance status, midstream urine culture, urinary leukocyte count, and albumin-globulin ratio (AGR). The midstream urine culture was excluded due to its inability to provide rapid results. The final model demonstrated good prediction accuracy and clinical utility, with no significant difference in performance compared to the initial model. The study developed a prediction model for urosepsis risk in diabetic patients with UUTS, presenting a convenient tool for timely diagnosis, particularly in non-operated patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.