Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40065041›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Risk factors and an optimized prediction model for urosepsis in diabetic patients with upper urinary tract stones.

Chongxiang Gao, Jiancen Liu, Dejuan Wang, Minghui Liu, Jianguang Qiu

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chongxiang GaoDepartment of Urology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Jiancen LiuDepartment of Urology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Dejuan WangDepartment of Urology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China. wangdej@mail.sysu.edu.cn.
Minghui LiuDepartment of Urology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China. liuminghui199710@163.com.
Jianguang QiuDepartment of Urology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China. qiujg@mail.sysu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To identify independent risk factors for urosepsis in diabetic patients with upper urinary tract stones (UUTS) and develop a prediction model to facilitate early detection and diagnosis, we retrospectively reviewed medical records of patients admitted between January 2020 and June 2023. Patients were divided based on the quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis was used for variable selection to form a preliminary model. The model was optimized and validated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, the Hosmer-Lemeshow test and calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA). A nomogram was constructed for visualization. A total of 434 patients were enrolled, with 66 cases and 368 controls. Six optimal predictors were identified: underweight, sarcopenia, poor performance status, midstream urine culture, urinary leukocyte count, and albumin-globulin ratio (AGR). The midstream urine culture was excluded due to its inability to provide rapid results. The final model demonstrated good prediction accuracy and clinical utility, with no significant difference in performance compared to the initial model. The study developed a prediction model for urosepsis risk in diabetic patients with UUTS, presenting a convenient tool for timely diagnosis, particularly in non-operated patients.

Indexed as

Diabetes ComplicationsDiabetes MellitusSepsisUrinary CalculiUrinary Tract InfectionsAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNomogramsRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsROC Curve

Identifiers

PMID40065041
PMCPMC11893776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.