Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40065039›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

The effect of social settings and olfactory environments on spontaneous movement synchrony.

M R Coeugnet, Y N Delevoye-Turrell, W Tschacher, J Coutinho

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

M R CoeugnetCNRS, UMR 9193 - SCALab - Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives, Univ. Lille, 59000, Lille, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9363-3947
Y N Delevoye-TurrellCNRS, UMR 9193 - SCALab - Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives, Univ. Lille, 59000, Lille, France. yvonne.delevoye@univ-lille.fr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4034-3684
W TschacherUniversity Hospital of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7357-0280
J CoutinhoPsychology Research Center (CIPsi), School of Psychology, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1562-0099

Funding

Research Federation (FR CNRS 2052) Visual Sciences and Cultures ANR-11-EQPX-0023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interpersonal synchrony refers to the temporal coordination between two individuals, signaling the coupling of their behaviors. Optimal movement synchrony in dyads is linked to more affiliative behavior, cooperation, and trust. However, there is limited research on how the sensory environment impacts interpersonal synchrony. One significant environmental factor influencing human behavior and social interactions is ambient odors. This study aimed to examine the effect of ambient odor on interpersonal synchrony, particularly in-phase movement synchrony. Motion energy analysis and windowed cross-correlations were used to measure synchrony levels between participants during video-recorded interactions. Twenty-five same-sex friend dyads performed three interaction tasks designed to create fun, cooperative, or competitive atmospheres. These tasks were conducted with a pleasant, stimulating peppermint odor or in a control condition without odor. Consistent with previous studies, higher synchrony levels were observed in fun atmospheres compared to competitive and cooperative ones. No significant effects of odor stimulation were found. Overall, the results confirm that social context significantly influences movement synchrony and affiliation, while ambient odor might not affect interpersonal synchrony, at least when the odor is irrelevant to the task.

Indexed as

Interpersonal RelationsOdorantsSmellSocial EnvironmentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMovementSocial BehaviorYoung AdultAnti-phase synchronyBehavioral synchronyCompetitionCooperationIn-phase synchronyOlfactive stimuli

Identifiers

PMID40065039
PMCPMC11893766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.