ArticleScientific reports2025
Mechanism of skull base osteoradionecrosis explored through laboratory assessment with propensity score-matched analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Delayed cerebral radiation necrosis after osteoradionecrosis of the skull base: a case report.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Skull base osteoradionecrosis (sbORN) is a severe complication of radiotherapy (RT) in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) that can severely affect quality of life (QOL) and may even be life-threatening. The etiology and pathogenesis of sbORN remain largely unknown or uncertain. Therefore, this study aimed to identify potential risk factors for sbORN by analyzing the laboratory assessments of patients to enable early clinical interventions. This retrospective case-control study reviewed NPC patients who were pathologically diagnosed with sbORN after primary radical radiotherapy. These patients were matched 1:1 with propensity scores for patients without sbORN at our center. The impact of laboratory examination indexes on sbORN occurrence was assessed using both univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. We reviewed 1,200 NPC patients who were followed up in our department from 2010 to 2020; a total of 57 patients met the inclusion criteria. Each patient underwent endoscopic and pathological examinations, which confirmed the diagnosis. In addition, 98 patients without sbORN were also collected and matched 1:1 by propensity score matching, resulting in the inclusion of 38 patients. Univariate logistic regression analysis revealed statistically significant differences in hemorrhage (HB), erythrocytes (RBC), albumin (Alb), platelets (PLT), indirect bilirubin (IBil), globulin (Glo), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and fibrinogen (Fg) between the two groups (p < 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed statistically significant differences only for Fg (p < 0.05). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis further demonstrated the diagnostic utility of Fg, yielding an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.829, with specificity and sensitivity values of 0.842 and 0.711, respectively. The occurrence of sbORN was closely associated with elevated plasma Fg levels, suggesting that high plasma Fg may be a potential risk factor for sbORN. Plasma Fg has a certain diagnostic value for sbORN and can be used as a supplementary diagnostic method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.