ArticleScientific reports2025
Accuracy of deep learning models in the detection of accessory ostium in coronal cone beam computed tomographic images.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automated Classification of Maxillary Sinus Ostium Patency Using a ConvNeXt-Tiny + DeiT Gated MLP-Based Hybrid Deep Learning Model: A Retrospective CBCT Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Combining machine learning and multi-omics analysis to explore the role of CPT1C in colorectal tumor cancer transformation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Deep learning-assisted CBCT segmentation provides reliable volumetric assessment of mandibular defects compared with micro-CT for 3D printing and surgical planning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Review
- Convolutional neural network for maxillary sinus segmentation based on the U-Net architecture at different planes in the Chinese population: a semantic segmentation study.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Recent advances in applications of artificial intelligence-assisted Raman spectroscopy in diagnosis of cancers.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2025Review
- Development and evaluation of a deep learning model for occlusion classification in intraoral photographs.PeerJ · 2025Article
- Transfer learning models in the detection of pulp calcifications- A preliminary study.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accessory ostium [AO] is one of the important anatomical variations in the maxillary sinus. AO is often associated with sinus pathology. Radiographic imaging plays a very important role in the detection of AO. Deep learning models have been used in maxillofacial imaging for interpretation and segmentation. However, there have been no research papers investigating the effectiveness of CNN in detecting AO in radiographs. To fill this gap of knowledge, we conducted a study to determine the accuracy of deep learning models in detecting AO in coronal CBCT images. Two examiners collected 454 coronal section images (227 with AO and 227 without AO) from 856 large field of view [FOV] cone beam tomography [CBCT] scans in the dental radiology archives of a teaching hospital. The collected images were then pre-processed and augmented to obtain 1260 images. Three pre-trained models, the Visual Geometry Group of the University of Oxford-16 layers [VGG16], MobileNetV2, and ResNet101V2, were used as base models. The performance of all the models was analyzed, and ResNet101v2 was selected for classification of images. Fine-tuning approach was employed with L1 (Lasso regression) regularization to avoid overfitting. The test accuracy and loss of the ResNet-101V2 classification model was 0.81 and 0.51, respectively. The precision, recall, F1-score, and AUC of the classification model were 0.82, 0.81, 0.81, and 0.87 respectively. ResNet-101V2 showed good accuracy in the detection of AO from coronal CBCT images. The present study used cropped two-dimensional images of CBCT scans. Future work can be carried out to determine the accuracy of deep learning models in the detection of AO in three-dimensional CBCT scans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.