Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40064997›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A novel approach for the detection of brain tumor and its classification via independent component analysis.

C Gunasundari, K Selva Bhuvaneswari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

C GunasundariSchool of Computing, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Tiruchirappalli, India. cgunasundari6@gmail.com.
K Selva BhuvaneswariDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University College of Engineering Kancheepuram, Kancheepuram, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A brain tumor is regarded as one of the deadliest types of cancer due to its intricate nature.This is why it is important that patients get the best possible diagnosis and treatment options. With the help of machine vision, neurologists can now perform a more accurate and faster diagnosis. There are currently no suitable methods that can be used to perform brain segmentation using image processing recently neural network model is used that it can perform better than other methods. Unfortunately, due to the complexity of the model, performing accurate brain segmentation in real images is not feasible. The main objective is to develop a novel method that can be used to analyze brain tumors using a component analysis. The proposed model consists of a deep neural network and an image processing framework. It is divided into various phases, such as the mapping stage, the data augmentation stage, and the tumor discovery stage. The data augmentation stage involves training a CNN to identify the regions of the image that are overlapping with the tumor space marker. The DCNN's predicted performance is compared with the test result. The third stage is focused on training a deep neural system and a SVM. This model was able to achieve a 99% accuracy rate and a sensitivity of 0.973%. It is primarily utilized for identifying brain tumors.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsImage Processing, Computer-AssistedAlgorithmsBrainDeep LearningHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeural Networks, ComputerSupport Vector MachineBrain tumor classificationDeep learningMRI processing

Identifiers

PMID40064997
PMCPMC11894048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.