Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40064991›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Leveraging large language models for knowledge-free weak supervision in clinical natural language processing.

Enshuo Hsu, Kirk Roberts

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Enshuo HsuMcWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Kirk RobertsMcWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA. kirk.roberts@uth.tmc.edu.

Funding

Fine-Grained Spatial Information Extraction For Radiology ReportsR21EB029575 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI ROBERTS, KIRK EDWARD · 2020 to 2022
$892k
Use of NLP to Extract Risk Indicators for Immunologic Disease from the Text of EHRs (UNIITE)R21AI164100 · NIAID · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI RIDER, NICHOLAS L, ROBERTS, KIRK EDWARD · 2022 to 2024
$379k
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases R21AI164100NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI164100NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB029575NIBIB NIH HHS R21EB029575
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The performance of deep learning-based natural language processing systems is based on large amounts of labeled training data which, in the clinical domain, are not easily available or affordable. Weak supervision and in-context learning offer partial solutions to this issue, particularly using large language models (LLMs), but their performance still trails traditional supervised methods with moderate amounts of gold-standard data. In particular, inferencing with LLMs is computationally heavy. We propose an approach leveraging fine-tuning LLMs and weak supervision with virtually no domain knowledge that still achieves consistently dominant performance. Using a prompt-based approach, the LLM is used to generate weakly-labeled data for training a downstream BERT model. The weakly supervised model is then further fine-tuned on small amounts of gold standard data. We evaluate this approach using Llama2 on three different i2b2/ n2c2 datasets for clinical named entity recognition. With no more than 10 gold standard notes, our final BERT models weakly supervised by fine-tuned Llama2-13B consistently outperformed out-of-the-box PubMedBERT by 4.7-47.9% in F1 scores. With only 50 gold standard notes, our models achieved close performance to fully fine-tuned systems.

Indexed as

Deep LearningNatural Language ProcessingHumansLarge Language ModelsElectronic health recordsLarge language modelsNatural language processingWeak supervision

Identifiers

PMID40064991
PMCPMC11893743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.