ArticleScientific reports2025
Leveraging large language models for knowledge-free weak supervision in clinical natural language processing.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- MechAInistic: A Reviewer-Supervised Multi-Agent LLM System for Auditable Mechanistic Drug-Hypothesis Generation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- SynthEHR-eviction: enhancing eviction SDoH detection with LLM-augmented synthetic EHR data.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Proceedings of the second Artificial Intelligence in Primary Immunodeficiency (AIPI) meeting.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2026Article
- A hybrid architecture for enhancing Chinese text processing using CNN and LLaMA2.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- LLM-IE: a python package for biomedical generative information extraction with large language models.JAMIA open · 2025Article
- Facilitating Clinical Information Extraction with Synthetic Data and Ontology using Large Language Models.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The performance of deep learning-based natural language processing systems is based on large amounts of labeled training data which, in the clinical domain, are not easily available or affordable. Weak supervision and in-context learning offer partial solutions to this issue, particularly using large language models (LLMs), but their performance still trails traditional supervised methods with moderate amounts of gold-standard data. In particular, inferencing with LLMs is computationally heavy. We propose an approach leveraging fine-tuning LLMs and weak supervision with virtually no domain knowledge that still achieves consistently dominant performance. Using a prompt-based approach, the LLM is used to generate weakly-labeled data for training a downstream BERT model. The weakly supervised model is then further fine-tuned on small amounts of gold standard data. We evaluate this approach using Llama2 on three different i2b2/ n2c2 datasets for clinical named entity recognition. With no more than 10 gold standard notes, our final BERT models weakly supervised by fine-tuned Llama2-13B consistently outperformed out-of-the-box PubMedBERT by 4.7-47.9% in F1 scores. With only 50 gold standard notes, our models achieved close performance to fully fine-tuned systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.