Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40064980›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2025

Impact of adapted physical activity and diet counselling on health-related quality of life in women undergoing adjuvant breast cancer therapy.

Célia Touraine, William Jacot, Sophie Gourgou, Marion Carayol, Pierre Senesse, Grégory Ninot, Caroline Mollevi

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01495650 (A Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Effect of a Tailored Program of Physical Activity and Nutritional Counseling on Fatigue Reduction in Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Adjuvant Treatment.), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01495650 phase3completednot on this map

A Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Effect of a Tailored Program of Physical Activity and Nutritional Counseling on Fatigue Reduction in Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Adjuvant Treatment.

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstitut du Cancer de Montpellier - Val d'AurelleRan2010 to 2014Enrolled240ConditionsBreast CancerArmsTailored program of PA and nutritional counseling
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Célia TouraineBiometrics Unit, Cancer Institute of Montpellier, University of Montpellier, 208 avenue des apothicaires, Parc Euromédecine, 34298, Montpellier Cedex 5, France. celia.touraine@gmail.com.
William JacotCancer Institute of Montpellier, INSERM U1194, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Sophie GourgouBiometrics Unit, Cancer Institute of Montpellier, University of Montpellier, 208 avenue des apothicaires, Parc Euromédecine, 34298, Montpellier Cedex 5, France.
Marion CarayolYouth - Physical and Sports Activity - Health Laboratory (JAP2S), University of Toulon, Toulon, France.
Pierre SenesseDepartment of Supportive and Palliative Care, Cancer Institute of Montpellier, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Grégory NinotDesbrest Institute of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Montpellier, INSERM, INRIA, Montpellier, France.
Caroline MolleviBiometrics Unit, Cancer Institute of Montpellier, University of Montpellier, 208 avenue des apothicaires, Parc Euromédecine, 34298, Montpellier Cedex 5, France.

Funding

SIRIC Montpellier Cancer Grant INCa_Inserm_DGOS_12553
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the monocentric APAD1 trial, 143 women with non-metastatic breast cancer were randomised to undergo either an adapted physical activity and diet counselling (APAD) program or usual care. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was prospectively evaluated using the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire at baseline, during treatment (adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy) and during follow-up. Our objective was two-fold: to analyse the impact of APAD on HRQoL using three approaches; to illustrate the advantages and disadvantages of each approach, and derive methodological recommendations. Analytical approaches utilised were: statistical testing to compare the mean HRQoL scores between baseline and end of study in both groups and the mean HRQoL scores between the two groups at the different assessment times; linear mixed models that modelled the longitudinal score data in both groups and tested whether the score trajectories were different between the groups; a survival analysis comparing the time to deterioration of HRQoL between the groups using a minimal clinically important difference. This study shows a substantial clinical benefit of the APAD intervention on HRQoL, especially for global health status/HRQoL, functioning scales and the fatigue symptom scale. Furthermore, this study highlights the advantages and disadvantages of three standard approaches used to analyse HRQoL data.Trial registration: The APAD1 study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (number NCT01495650, date 20/12/2011).

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCounselingDietExerciseQuality of LifeAdultAgedChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleHumansMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesBreast cancerClinical trialHealth-related quality of lifeLinear mixed modelsLongitudinal dataTime to deterioration

Identifiers

PMID40064980
PMCPMC11893781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.