ArticleScientific reports2025
Identification of potential drug targets for pelvic organ prolapse using a proteome-wide Mendelian randomization approach.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tissue Biomarkers Outperform Plasma Signals in Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Evidence of a Dominant Extracellular Matrix Remodelling Phenotype.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Article
- Decoding the genetic architecture of hernia through genome-wide association and multi-trait analyses.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- AI-driven discovery of novel extracellular matrix biomarkers in pelvic organ prolapse.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) significantly impacts patients' quality of life, and current treatment options remain limited due to high recurrence rates, making the exploration of new therapeutic targets essential. Using data from the FinnGen cohort, we performed a proteome-wide Mendelian randomization (PW-MR) analysis. Through PW-MR and Bayesian colocalization analyses, we identified EFEMP1 and MFAP4 as potential key drug targets, with EFEMP1 potentially exerting a protective effect, whereas MFAP4 may be associated with an increased risk of POP. To further support these findings, we analysed single-cell RNA sequencing data to evaluate the expression patterns of EFEMP1 and MFAP4 in different cell populations. The analysis revealed that EFEMP1 and MFAP4 are specifically enriched in cell types involved in tissue remodelling and fibrosis. Findings of phenome-wide association studies indicated that the risk of side effects for these targets may be low, suggesting the safety of treatment focused on these targets. Preliminary molecular docking analysis findings suggested that EFEMP1 and MFAP4 may have strong binding affinities with candidate drugs, further supporting the feasibility of EFEMP1 and MFAP4 as drug targets. In conclusion, our findings indicate that EFEMP1 and MFAP4 are promising therapeutic targets for POP, providing important insights for the development of safe and effective treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.