ArticleScientific reports2025
Application and design of a decision-making model in ethical dilemma for self-driving cars.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) has promoted application and development of self-driving cars. However, when self-driving cars encounter ethical dilemma, it is still hard to make a satisficing and clear decision-making by these present moral rules and mechanisms, which makes people distrust in self-driving cars in real life. It is necessary to design a computational and multi-factor decision-making model for self-driving cars. ACWADOE (WADOE Based on Attribute Correlation) is proposed to achieve probabilities of going straight and swerving in ethical dilemmas from more influencing factors to make satisficing and clear decision-making as far as possible. In order to construct ACWADOE model, the prior probability between influencing factor and decision-making is calculated by survey data in moral machine, which can express human preferences and tendencies, align with the requirements of the majority. Then 116 dilemmas are designed and chosen to solve correlation coefficient between influencing factors. Moreover, 84 comparative dilemmas are designed to achieve information gain ratio between influencing factors, then the weight of each factor in decision-making can be calculated by constructing pairwise comparison matrix. Lastly, 40 dilemmas are used to test and verify NB (Naive Bayes), ADOE (Averaged One-Dependence Estimators), WADOE (Weighted ADOE) and ACWADOE respectively. The test results show that ACWADOE is more suitable with human requirements than other models, its accuracy is 92.5%. Furthermore, ACWADOE not only provides a computational decision-making model in ethical dilemma for self-driving cars, but also provides a few references for other AI systems to solve ethical dilemma, which is conducive to make satisficing and clear decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.