Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40064959›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Application and design of a decision-making model in ethical dilemma for self-driving cars.

Guoman Liu, Jing Sheng, Zhen Tao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Guoman LiuJiangxi Province Key Laboratory of Precision Drive and Equipment, Nanchang Institute of Technology, Nanchang, 330099, China. jerry@nit.edu.cn.
Jing ShengJiangxi Province Key Laboratory of Precision Drive and Equipment, Nanchang Institute of Technology, Nanchang, 330099, China.
Zhen TaoJiangxi Province Key Laboratory of Precision Drive and Equipment, Nanchang Institute of Technology, Nanchang, 330099, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has promoted application and development of self-driving cars. However, when self-driving cars encounter ethical dilemma, it is still hard to make a satisficing and clear decision-making by these present moral rules and mechanisms, which makes people distrust in self-driving cars in real life. It is necessary to design a computational and multi-factor decision-making model for self-driving cars. ACWADOE (WADOE Based on Attribute Correlation) is proposed to achieve probabilities of going straight and swerving in ethical dilemmas from more influencing factors to make satisficing and clear decision-making as far as possible. In order to construct ACWADOE model, the prior probability between influencing factor and decision-making is calculated by survey data in moral machine, which can express human preferences and tendencies, align with the requirements of the majority. Then 116 dilemmas are designed and chosen to solve correlation coefficient between influencing factors. Moreover, 84 comparative dilemmas are designed to achieve information gain ratio between influencing factors, then the weight of each factor in decision-making can be calculated by constructing pairwise comparison matrix. Lastly, 40 dilemmas are used to test and verify NB (Naive Bayes), ADOE (Averaged One-Dependence Estimators), WADOE (Weighted ADOE) and ACWADOE respectively. The test results show that ACWADOE is more suitable with human requirements than other models, its accuracy is 92.5%. Furthermore, ACWADOE not only provides a computational decision-making model in ethical dilemma for self-driving cars, but also provides a few references for other AI systems to solve ethical dilemma, which is conducive to make satisficing and clear decisions.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceAutomobile DrivingAutomobilesDecision MakingBayes TheoremEthical DilemmasHumansModels, TheoreticalComparison matrixDecision-makingEthical dilemmasSelf-driving cars

Identifiers

PMID40064959
PMCPMC11894101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.