ArticleScientific reports2025
Predictive value of scoring systems for stone free status and complications before percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative performance of five nephrolithometry scoring systems and a novel nomogram for predicting stone-free rate following pediatric percutaneous nephrolithotomy.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Article
- Commentary on "Does suction in mini PCNL mitigate rise in intrarenal pressure? a prospective randomised study".Urolithiasis · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PCNL, a minimally invasive surgical technique for kidney stone removal, relies on achieving stone-free status, which various scoring systems aim to predict. This study assesses the predictive accuracy of the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society (CROES) and Guy's Stone Score (GSS) systems in determining stone-free rates following percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in pediatric patients. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 580 pediatric patients who underwent PCNL at Çukurova University Urology Clinic between January 2007 and March 2024. Patients were categorized into two groups based on postoperative stone status: Group 1 and Group 2. CROES and GSS scores were calculated for each patient. The association between these scores and stone-free status, as well as postoperative complications, was statistically analyzed. Additionally, subgroup analyses were performed based on age groups. The study showed that 83.7% of patients achieved a stone-free condition postoperatively. Significant differences were found between the stone-free and residual stone groups regarding stone burden and operative time (p < 0.001). CROES had high accuracy for predicting stone-free outcomes (p < 0.001), while GSS was also effective in predicting both stone-free rates and complications. CROES was less effective in predicting complications. Both CROES and GSS are valuable for predicting PCNL outcomes in pediatric patients. While CROES is more reliable for stone-free rates, GSS better predicts complications. However, their limitations highlight the need for pediatric-specific scoring models. Until such models are developed, these systems should be used with caution alongside individualized clinical assessments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.