Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40064939›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Spatially fractionated minibeam radiation delivered at clinically feasible dose rates induces transient vascular permeability.

Jennifer Fazzari, Cristian Fernandez-Palomo, Paolo Pellicioli, Liam Day, Verdiana Trappetti, Fabrice Lucien-Matteoni, Yohan Kim, Robert Mutter, Sean Park, Michael Grams and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Minibeam Radiation Therapy for Recurrent Mucosal Melanoma: An Eye-Opening Response.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jennifer FazzariInstitute of Anatomy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Cristian Fernandez-PalomoInstitute of Anatomy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Paolo PellicioliInstitute of Anatomy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Liam DayInstitute of Anatomy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Verdiana TrappettiInstitute of Anatomy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Fabrice Lucien-MatteoniDepartment of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Yohan KimDepartment of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Robert MutterDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Sean ParkDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Michael GramsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Valentin DjonovInstitute of Anatomy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. valentin.djonov@unibe.ch.

Funding

Women's Cancer ProgramP30CA015083 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI AKHILESH PANDEY · 1985 to 2026
$151.3M
EU Grant BG-RRP-2.004-0004-C01NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015083Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 310030-220064/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbeam Radiation Therapy is a preclinical form of spatially fractionated radiation therapy that utilizes synchrotron X-rays to deliver highly heterogeneous dose distributions at a micrometric scale. This radiation scheme has been shown to facilitate the induction of controlled and reversible vascular permeability, enhancing treatment efficacy of systemic therapeutic agents. Despite the promising preclinical results, translating microbeam SFRT to the clinic has been hindered by a reliance on synchrotron sources that operate at dose rates orders of magnitude greater than what is possible with clinical machines. Without rapid dose delivery, the microbeam geometry is susceptible to blurring due to physiologic motion when delivered at clinical dose rates. Therefore, larger beam widths, spaced further apart (minibeams) were employed to determine whether such effects can be observed with clinically achievable doses and dose rates. Vascular permeability was assessed in the chick chorioallantoic membrane vasculature following minibeam irradiation delivered at peak doses (10 Gy) and dose rates (10 Gy/s and 0.05 Gy/s) approaching clinical relevance. Transient, reversible permeability could be induced at these dose rates beginning 1-2 h post-irradiation. This was followed by temporary vascular occlusion in the beam path that was resolved by 7 h when delivered at 10 Gy/s but persisted longer when delivered at 0.05 Gy/s. Despite these changes, vascular function was maintained at both dose rates by 24 h post-IR, differing only in the degree of regeneration. The induction of permeability was also maintained when using a clinical orthovoltage system further supporting the potential clinical application of minibeam radiation therapy.

Indexed as

Capillary PermeabilityChorioallantoic MembraneDose Fractionation, RadiationAnimalsChick EmbryoDose-Response Relationship, RadiationHumansSynchrotrons

Identifiers

PMID40064939
PMCPMC11894116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.