Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40064917›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

The lateralized LC-NAergic system distinguishes vicarious versus direct fear in mice.

Jong-Hyun Kim, Da-Eun Choi, Hee-Sup Shin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jong-Hyun KimCenter for Cognition and Sociality, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), 55 Expo-ro, Yusung-gu, Daejeon, 34126, Republic of Korea.
Da-Eun ChoiCenter for Cognition and Sociality, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), 55 Expo-ro, Yusung-gu, Daejeon, 34126, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-7630-420X
Hee-Sup ShinCenter for Cognition and Sociality, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), 55 Expo-ro, Yusung-gu, Daejeon, 34126, Republic of Korea. shin@ibs.re.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4260-3718

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fear can be induced either directly through self-experience of aversive events or vicariously by observing conspecifics experiencing such events. The locus coeruleus-norepinephrine (LC-NA) system is crucial in fear responses and cognitive processes. We investigated whether the LC-NA system differentially processes these two types of fear, direct and vicarious in male mice. The results highlighted that the right hemisphere LC→anterior cingulate cortex pathway is uniquely crucial for vicarious fear, while the two inputs to the LC-from the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST) and the central amygdala (CeA)-differentially contribute to fear processing. The BNST plays a more targeted role in vicarious fear, and the CeA has a broader influence on fear in general. This underscores the complexity and specialization within the LC-NA system for fear-processing.

Indexed as

FearLocus CoeruleusAnimalsCentral Amygdaloid NucleusGyrus CinguliMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLSeptal Nuclei

Identifiers

PMID40064917
PMCPMC11894102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.