Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40064884›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Signatures of paracrystallinity in amorphous silicon from machine-learning-driven molecular dynamics.

Louise A M Rosset, David A Drabold, Volker L Deringer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Louise A M RossetDepartment of Chemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-1383-4367
David A DraboldDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Ohio University, Athens, OH, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5344-5837
Volker L DeringerDepartment of Chemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. volker.deringer@chem.ox.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6873-0278

Funding

RCUK | Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) EP/X035891/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The structure of amorphous silicon has been studied for decades. The two main theories are based on a continuous random network and on a 'paracrystalline' model, respectively-the latter defined as showing localized structural order resembling the crystalline state whilst retaining an overall amorphous network. However, the extent of this local order has been unclear, and experimental data have led to conflicting interpretations. Here we show that signatures of paracrystallinity in an otherwise disordered network are indeed compatible with experimental observations for amorphous silicon. We use quantum-mechanically accurate, machine-learning-driven simulations to systematically sample the configurational space of quenched silicon, thereby allowing us to elucidate the boundary between amorphization and crystallization. We analyze our dataset using structural and local-energy descriptors to show that paracrystalline models are consistent with experiments in both regards. Our work provides a unified explanation for seemingly conflicting theories in one of the most widely studied amorphous networks.

Identifiers

PMID40064884
PMCPMC11894222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.