ArticleBlood cancer journal2025
A real-world experience of efficacy and safety of belantamab mafodotin in relapsed refractory multiple myeloma.
Article in Blood cancer journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- When Myeloma Escapes the Bone Marrow: Extramedullary Disease in the Immunotherapy Era.Cancers · 2026Review
- Current positioning and future development of belantamab mafodotin and other antibody-drug conjugates to treat multiple myeloma.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Ocular toxicity associated with antibody-drug conjugates in cancer therapy: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- A review of clinical pharmacology considerations in antibody-drug conjugates approved by the US Food and Drug Administration between 2000 and 2025.Translational and clinical pharmacology · 2025Review
- Therapeutic options for extramedullary involvement in multiple myeloma.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
While initial trials led to the accelerated approval of belantamab mafodotin, a BCMA-directed antibody-drug conjugate, confirmatory trials failed to establish benefit from this therapy for patients with relapsed refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), eventually leading to its withdrawal from commercial use. With an imminent approval as an effective combination therapy, as seen in recent randomized trials, we report real-world clinical outcomes with belantamab mafodotin in 81 RRMM patients. With a median of 5 (range 2-15) prior lines of therapy, 92, 45, and 15% of the patients were triple-class refractory, penta-class refractory, and BCMA-refractory. More than half (57%) of the patients had high-risk cytogenetics, 37% had extramedullary disease (EMD), and 67% of the patients would have been considered ineligible for the DREAMM-2 trial. The best overall response (ORR) and complete response rates were 40.0 and 15.0%, respectively. ORRs were lower in patients with EMD, BCMA-refractory, and penta-refractory disease at 23, 17, and 24%, respectively. All-grade ocular toxicity was seen in 69% of patients, with grade 3+ events in 43%. Grade 3+ hematological toxicities included neutropenia (20%), anemia (28%), and thrombocytopenia (31%). With a median follow-up of 11.3 (0.3-44.6) months for the entire population, median PFS and OS were 5 (1-20) months and 12 (3-28) months, respectively. Presence of EMD was the only predictor of both PFS and OS on multivariable analysis. Compared to the pivotal trial and despite several high-risk disease features, belantamab mafodotin demonstrated comparable efficacy and safety in this real-world patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.