Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40064838›Full record

ReviewJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2026

Immune checkpoint inhibitors and myocardial infarction.

Vencel Juhasz, Giselle Alexandra Suero-Abreu, Tomas G Neilan

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Thrombosis in patients with cancer: challenges and advances.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2025
    Article
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Vencel JuhaszCardiovascular Imaging Research Center, Division of Cardiology, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9100-4952
Giselle Alexandra Suero-AbreuCardiovascular Imaging Research Center, Division of Cardiology, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Tomas G NeilanCardiovascular Imaging Research Center, Division of Cardiology, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. tneilan@mgh.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1513-8833

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer therapy since their first approval in 2011. By unleashing the adaptive immune system, non-cardiac and cardiac immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are common and often pose a challenge to multidisciplinary teams treating cancer patients. A significant body of literature reports accelerated atherosclerosis - a key precursor of acute vascular events (AVEs) - with currently approved ICIs (CTLA-4, PD-1, LAG-3, and PD-L1 inhibitors), and some preclinical research also suggests increased thrombogenicity. A large meta-analysis has reported an increased incidence of AVEs, including myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke with ICIs. In addition, dyslipidemia secondary to ICI use may lead to an increase in cardiovascular (CV) events in long-term cancer survivors. Currently, there are no specific guidelines for the treatment of MI or CV risk in cancer patients with ICIs. Overall survival (≥ 6 months), thrombogenic, and bleeding risk are key determinants in choosing the appropriate acute approach and antithrombotic therapy, while other principles of MI management do not differ between cancer and non-cancer patients. Future avenues of research include lipid-lowering therapies, including PCSK9 inhibitors and statins, which may offer dual beneficial effects by improving anti-cancer efficacy and reducing CV risk. In addition, newer immune checkpoint targets may provide atheroprotection while being effective against certain cancers (e.g., CD47). Given the tremendous potential of ICIs, intensive research is warranted to reduce CV risk and the incidence of AVE, including MI, in active cancer patients and survivors.

Indexed as

Immune Checkpoint InhibitorsMyocardial InfarctionNeoplasmsAtherosclerosisHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsAcute vascular eventsAtherosclerosisImmune checkpoint inhibitorsImmunotherapyMyocardial infarction

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.