ArticleWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2025
Metagenomic insights of microbial functions under conventional and conservation agriculture.
Article in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- SIPdb: a stable isotope probing database and analytical dashboard for linking amplicon sequences to microbial activity using reverse ecology.ISME communications · 2026Article
- Deciphering genotype and geography dependent microbiome composition and its role in disease suppression in Ashwagandha.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Agricultural practices such as conventional (CN) and conservation agriculture (CA) influence the composition and structure of soil microorganisms. We used short reads and genome-resolved metagenomic-based dual sequencing approaches to create a profile of bacterial and archaeal communities in hyperthermic Typic Haplustepts soil after seven years of CA and CN. The most differences in the physico-chemical and biological properties of soil were higher pH, organics carbon, available nitrogen and microbial biomass contents, activities of dehydrogenase, β-glucosidase, and arylsulfatase, found in CA soil. The dominant bacterial taxa under both management types were Pseudomonadota (46-48%), Acidobacteriota (12-13%), Planctomycetota (8-10%), Bacteroidota (7-8%), and Actinomycetota (6-7%). Nitrososphaerota (1.1-1.5%) was the predominant archaeal phyla in CA and CN soils. The alpha diversity was 1.5 times higher in CA compared to CN soils. Fourteen high-quality (HQ) metagenomic-assembled genomes (MAGs) were recovered from both groups. Four HQ metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) from the Pseudomonadota phylum were exclusively recovered from the CA soil. The dominance of this phylum in the CA soil might be correlated with its nutrient richness, as certain classes of Pseudomonadota, such as Alpha, Beta-, Gamma-, and Deltaproteobacteria, are known to be copiotrophic. Copiotrophic organisms thrive in nutrient-rich environments, which could explain their prevalence in the CA soil. CAZyme gene analysis showed that Glycoside Hydrolases (GH) and GlycosylTransferases (GT) classes are dominant in the CA group, possibly due to higher substrate availability from the application of crop residues, which provide a rich source of complex carbohydrates. Several biogeochemical gene families related to C1 compounds, hydrogen, oxygen, and sulfur metabolism were enriched in CA soils, suggesting these practices may contribute to a soil environment with increased organic matter content, microbial diversity, and nutrient availability. Overall, CA practices seemed to improve soil health by supporting soil microbial communities abundance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40064739What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.