ArticleEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2025
Extra-capsular proximal femoral fractures: a cohort comparison of union and complication rates after ballistic versus blunt trauma.
Article in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study seeks to (1) describe the management of civilian ballistic extra-capsular proximal femur fractures (2) assess the rate of nonunion and complications and (3) compare the time to union of ballistic and blunt pertrochanteric femur fractures. Given the enhanced and widened extensive inflammatory response with ballistic trauma, we hypothesized that hip fractures from ballistic mechanisms would have faster times to union.
methodsPatients were included if they were skeletally mature with extra-capsular pertrochanteric femur fractures and radiographic and clinical follow-up of at least 6 months. Additional exclusion criteria included prior femur fractures and pathologic fractures. Orthopedic Trauma Association classification of all fractures was included. Union rate, time to union and complications were measured. Clinical union was defined as absence of pain with ambulation at the fracture site. Radiographic union was defined as mRUST ≥ 11. mRUST was measured at 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months. Patients were included if they met study end points of a minimum of 6 months of follow-up, achieved union, or underwent revision surgery for nonunion.
results52 fractures (23 ballistic, 29 blunt fractures) matched by age, BMI, sex, diabetes, and current smoking status were included in the study. 95.7% of the ballistic (22/23) and 100% of the blunt (29/29) fractures united. Average time to union was 90.5 days for the ballistic cohort and 114.9 days for the blunt cohort (p = 0.03). There were six additional complications: three broken interlocks, one varus malalignment, one superficial infection, and one infection requiring an antibiotic spacer.
conclusionIn our series, we found the average time to union for ballistic pertrochanteric femur fractures was significantly less than that for blunt pertrochanteric femur fractures. There was no significant difference in complications or total nonunion. Overall, our study shows both subgroups achieved union in 3 months, which is less than previously reported. The time to union may be increased in the ballistic fractures by the enhanced and widened extensive inflammatory response or the blast effect may inoculate osteogenic material in to the soft tissues that enhances the healing process. This study demonstrates unique characteristics of ballistic fracture healing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40064705What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.