Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40064700›Full record

ArticleArchives of toxicology2025

Toxicity of ACP-105: a substance used as doping in sports: application of in silico methods for prediction of selected toxicological endpoints.

Oktawia Fijałkowska, Kamil Jurowski

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of toxicology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Oktawia FijałkowskaToxicological Science Club 'Paracelsus', Institute of Medical Studies, Medical College, Rzeszów University, Al. mjr. W. Kopisto 2a, 35-959, Rzeszów, Poland.
Kamil JurowskiLaboratory of Innovative Toxicological Research and Analyzes, Institute of Medical Studies, Medical College, Rzeszów University, Al. mjr. W. Kopisto 2a, 35-959, Rzeszów, Poland. toksykologia@ur.edu.pl.ORCID 0000-0003-0310-2849

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ACP-105 is a novel non-steroidal Selective Androgen Receptor Modulator (SARM) used by athletes. Its action aims to increase muscle mass and is one of the options in testosterone replacement therapy. Its safety profile remains insufficiently explored, particularly regarding its toxicity in humans. The lack of information about the studied compound in the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) became the purpose of this study. Given the increasing use of such compounds in sports, a deeper understanding of their biological risks is crucial. This study not only fills the gap in available information but also contributes to the growing body of research on SARMs, providing insights into their potential hazards and guiding future investigations into their safety. This work aimed to use various in silico techniques to predict the toxicity of ACP-105, including acute toxicity, effects on internal organs, genotoxicity based on the Ames test, eye and skin irritation, and cardiotoxicity by testing hERG inhibitors. A preliminary safety analysis of the compound was based on its chemical structure and interactions with biological targets using various in silico techniques: qualitative (STopTox, ADMETlab, admetSAR, ProTox 3.0, and Toxtree 3.1.0) and quantitative (TEST 5.1.2, Percepta, VEGA QSAR 1.2.3, and SL-Tox) to ensure that the prediction results are as accurate as possible.

Indexed as

Doping in SportsPerformance-Enhancing SubstancesAnimalsComputer SimulationHumansMutagenicity TestsReceptors, AndrogenRisk AssessmentPerformance-Enhancing SubstancesReceptors, AndrogenACP-105Acute toxicityDopingHealth effectsIn silicoNew psychoactive substances

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.