Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40064694›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2025

Identification of risk factors related to problematic peripheral neuropathy development in gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel treatment for pancreatic cancer.

Yoshitaka Saito, Yoh Takekuma, Yoshito Komatsu, Mitsuru Sugawara

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Impact of baseline hypoalbuminemia on peripheral edema induced by gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel for pancreatic cancer treatment.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yoshitaka SaitoDepartment of Clinical Pharmaceutics & Therapeutics, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Hokkaido University of Science, 4-1, Maeda 7-Jo 15-Chome, Teine-Ku, Sapporo, 006-8585, Japan. saito-yo@hus.ac.jp.
Yoh TakekumaDepartment of Pharmacy, Hokkaido University Hospital, Kita 14-Jo, Nishi 5-Chome, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, 060-8648, Japan.
Yoshito KomatsuCancer Center, Hokkaido University Hospital, Kita 14-Jo, Nishi 5-Chome, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, 060-8648, Japan.
Mitsuru SugawaraDepartment of Pharmacy, Hokkaido University Hospital, Kita 14-Jo, Nishi 5-Chome, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, 060-8648, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeChemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a common adverse effect in patients treated with gemcitabine (GEM) and nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-PTX) for pancreatic cancer, negatively impacting their quality of life. This study aimed to identify risk factors for significant CIPN development in a real-world setting of GEM + nab-PTX treatment to inform effective management strategies.

methodsPatients with unresectable pancreatic cancer who received GEM + nab-PTX (n = 140) were retrospectively assessed. The primary endpoint was to identify the risk factor(s) associated with the development of problematic grade ≥ 2 CIPN within six months of treatment initiation. We also evaluated factors associated with all-grade CIPN and compared CIPN incidence across specific patient groups.

resultsThe incidence of grade ≥ 2 CIPN was 35.0%, with 63.6% of patients experiencing symptoms of any grade. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis identified baseline preexisting neuropathy as an independent risk factor for developing grade ≥ 2 CIPN (adjusted hazard ratio 4.03, 95% confidence interval 1.82-8.96, P = 0.0006). Conversely, dose modification of nab-PTX at or within 4 weeks of treatment initiation emerged as a protective factor (0.45, 0.22-0.91, P = 0.03). Additionally, the cumulative incidence of grade ≥ 2 CIPN was significantly lower and delayed in patients who underwent dose modification within 4 weeks compared to those who did not in the population with preexisting neuropathy (P = 0.01).

conclusionBaseline preexisting neuropathy significantly increases the risk, while early dose modification of nab-PTX serves as a protective factor against developing grade ≥ 2 CIPN in patients receiving GEM + nab-PTX treatment for pancreatic cancer.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsDeoxycytidinePancreatic NeoplasmsPeripheral Nervous System DiseasesAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAlbuminsFemaleGemcitabineHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedPaclitaxelProportional Hazards Models130-nm albumin-bound paclitaxelAlbuminsDeoxycytidineGemcitabinePaclitaxelChemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathyGemcitabineNab-paclitaxelPancreatic cancerPeripheral neuropathyRisk factor

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.