Trial reportAlcohol, clinical & experimental research2025
Contingency management to promote treatment engagement in comorbid alcohol use disorder and alcohol-related liver disease: Findings from a pilot randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Alcohol, clinical & experimental research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Contingency management to promote treatment engagement in comorbid alcohol use disorder and alcohol-related liver disease: Findings from a pilot randomized controlled trial.Alcohol, clinical & experimental research · 2025Trial
- Contingency management interventions for substance use and addictive behaviours: Review of the United Kingdom evidence base.Addiction (Abingdon, England) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlcohol-related liver disease (ARLD) is a leading cause of preventable death and health inequalities. Evidence-based interventions for comorbid alcohol use disorder (AUD) and ARLD remain limited, and only a small proportion of this clinical population engages with treatment. There is a need to improve patient outcomes by bridging this gap through novel, person-centred interventions. Contingency management (CM) is a psychosocial intervention that involves gradual, increasing incentives upon the completion of treatment-related goals, such as treatment attendance. This single-centre, randomized pilot trial of voucher-based CM was conducted to promote treatment engagement in comorbid AUD and ARLD.
methodsThirty service users were recruited from an inpatient setting, offered integrated liver care (ILC) and allocated to ILC only or ILC + CM. Primary outcomes included feasibility criteria (recruitment, study retention post-randomization, completeness of data and protocol fidelity). Secondary outcome data on engagement, alcohol intake, and liver function were also collected. Data were gathered at baseline, post-ILC, and 12 weeks post-ILC and analyzed through descriptive statistics.
resultsThe feasibility of the research was subject to challenges inherent to conducting applied health research in a real-world clinical setting. The recruitment and retention rates were 73.20% and 36.70%, respectively. All participants received CM per protocol. An increasing trend in engagement was observed in the ILC + CM compared to ILC only (67% vs. 33%). A trending 76% reduction in alcohol intake and an overall improvement in liver outcomes were observed among participants engaging with the trial, with no significant differences between control and treatment groups.
conclusionOverall, the CM intervention was feasible to deliver and appears promising in improving outcomes in individuals with comorbid AUD and ARLD. Aspects related to recruitment, study retention post-randomization, and protocol fidelity need to be further adapted before proceeding with a definitive trial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.