ArticleJournal of molecular cell biology2025
A nomogram to predict gestational diabetes mellitus: a multicenter retrospective study.
Article in Journal of molecular cell biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- LASSO regression-derived first-trimester (9-14Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
While gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) poses great threat to the health of mothers and children, there is no standard early prediction model for this disease yet. This study developed and evaluated a nomogram for predicting GDM in early pregnancy. Overall, 1824 pregnant women were randomly divided into the training and internal validation sets in the ratio of 7:3, with additional 1604 pregnant women for external validation. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to develop a prediction model for GDM, and a nomogram was utilized for model visualization. Risk factors in the prediction model involved age, pre-pregnancy body mass index, reproductive history, family history of diabetes, creatinine level, triglyceride level, low-density lipoprotein level, neutrophil count, and monocyte count. Model performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves, and decision clinical analysis (DCA). The area under ROC curve (AUC) value of the model was 0.804 for the training set, and similar AUC values were obtained for the internal (0.800) and external (0.829) validation sets, verifying the stability of the model. The calibration curves showed that the probabilities of GDM predicted by the nomogram highly correlated with the observed frequency values. The DCA curves indicated that the prediction model is clinically useful, thus potentially aiding early pregnancy management in women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.