Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40064524›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2025

Exploring Changes in Primary Motor Cortex Organization and Associations With Changes in Motor-Sensory Tests Over Time in Relation to Low Back Pain Recovery. A Longitudinal Study.

Sabrine P Klerx, Sjoerd M Bruijn, Michel W Coppieters, Henri Kiers, Jos W R Twisk, Annelies L Pool-Goudzwaard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sabrine P KlerxFaculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences-Program Musculoskeletal Health, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9452-853X
Sjoerd M BruijnFaculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences-Program Musculoskeletal Health, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0290-2131
Michel W CoppietersFaculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences-Program Musculoskeletal Health, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3958-4408
Henri KiersFaculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences-Program Musculoskeletal Health, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9128-2108
Jos W R TwiskDepartment of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9617-1020
Annelies L Pool-GoudzwaardFaculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences-Program Musculoskeletal Health, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8524-2516

Funding

Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research 016. Vidi.178.014Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research 023.010.068
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The evidence for primary motor cortex reorganization in people with low back pain varies and is conflicting. Little is known about its association with motor and sensory tests, and recovery. We investigated primary motor cortex (re)organization and its associations with motor and sensory tests over time in people with (N = 25) and without (N = 25) low back pain in a longitudinal study with a 5-week follow-up. Participants with low back pain received physical therapy. Primary motor cortex organization, including the center of gravity and area of the cortical representation of trunk muscles, was evaluated using neuronavigated transcranial magnetic stimulation, based on individual magnetic resonance imaging. A motor control test (spiral tracking test) and sensory tests (quantitative sensory testing, graphaesthesia, and 2-point discrimination) were administered. Multivariate mixed models with a 3-level structure were used. In non-recovered participants, the center of gravity of longissimus L5 moved significantly anterior, and their temporal summation of pain decreased significantly more than in people without low back pain. The spiral tracking path length decreased significantly in participants without low back pain, which differed significantly from the increase in recovered participants. Significant associations were found between center of gravity and area with quantitative sensory tests and the spiral tracking test. We found a limited number of significant changes and associations over time, mainly related to longissimus L5. For some of these findings, no logical explanation seems currently available. Hence, it is unclear whether meaningful changes in cortical organization occur in people with low back pain over a 5-week period.

Indexed as

Low Back PainMotor CortexAdultFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedTranscranial Magnetic Stimulationbrain mappinglow back painrehabilitation, motor control, paintranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID40064524
PMCPMC11893288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.