ArticleNursing open2025
Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Florida Patient Acceptance Survey.
Article in Nursing open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimTo validate the Korean version of the Florida Patient Acceptance Survey (K-FPAS) and assess its reliability in evaluating the acceptance of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) among Korean patients.
designA methodological research study was conducted to develop and validate the K-FPAS as a valuable tool for assessing ICD acceptance and its related factors in the Korean patient population.
methodsA total of 243 participants, aged 18 years and older, who had received ICDs within the past year and were regularly monitored by cardiac specialists, were included in the study. The K-FPAS was meticulously translated and underwent expert validation, exploratory factor analysis, and confirmatory factor analysis to establish its construct validity. Content validity was confirmed by seven experts, and concurrent validity was examined using the Short Form-36 Health Survey. The reliability of the K-FPAS was assessed for internal consistency.
resultsThe K-FPAS demonstrated robust content and construct validity, consisting of 15 items organised into four subdomains: "Return to Life," "Device-Related Distress," "Positive Appraisal," and "Body Image Concerns."
conclusionThe K-FPAS is a valid and reliable instrument for evaluating ICD acceptance among Korean patients. It provides a robust methodological framework for exploring the multidimensional facets of ICD acceptance, particularly highlighting the significance of psychological and emotional well-being. This tool demonstrates considerable potential for advancing nursing research and guiding evidence-based interventions to enhance ICD acceptance and improve the overall quality of life for ICD recipients. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Patients contributed to this study by providing responses on the study questionnaires, and five hospitals supported the data collection process by providing suitable facilities for interviews and questionnaires. This research aims to benefit patients and improve their well-being through better ICD acceptance assessment and support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.