Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40064481›Full record

ReviewAnnals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery2025

Neoadjuvant treatment for incidental gallbladder cancer: A systematic review.

Peeyush Varshney, Saphalta Baghmar, Bhawna Sirohi, Ghassan K Abou-Alfa, Hop Tran Cao, Lalit Mohan Sharma, Milind Javle, Thorsten Goetze, Vinay K Kapoor

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Peeyush VarshneyDepartment of Surgical Gastroenterology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6276-1890
Saphalta BaghmarDepartment of Medical Oncology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Faridabad, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7713-3851
Bhawna SirohiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Vedanta Medical Research Foundation, Balco Medical Center, Raipur, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8093-1531
Ghassan K Abou-AlfaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1522-8054
Hop Tran CaoDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8612-8272
Lalit Mohan SharmaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Hospital, Jaipur, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7552-5931
Milind JavleDepartment of Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9158-0941
Thorsten GoetzeDepartment of Visceral Surgery, Krankenhaus Nordwest, Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8633-2748
Vinay K KapoorDepartment of Surgical Gastroenterology, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Hospital, Jaipur, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6953-7947

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Incidental gallbladder cancer (iGBC) diagnosed post-histopathological examination of gallbladders removed assuming benign gallstone disease constitutes a significant proportion of GBC patients. Most iGBC patients present with early-stage disease. The standard care for localized (non-metastatic) iGBC includes a reoperation for complete extended (radical) cholecystectomy involving liver resection and lymphadenectomy, followed by postoperative adjuvant systemic therapy. However, a major drawback of this approach is the high recurrence rate within six months post-radical surgery, which undermines the benefits of the extensive procedure; notably, most recurrences are distant, highlighting the efficacy of systemic therapy. Similar to other gastrointestinal cancers, there appears to be a potential for neoadjuvant systemic therapy (chemotherapy) before reoperative surgery in iGBC cases. The premise that neoadjuvant systemic therapy aids in selecting diseases with more favorable biological characteristics and addresses micro-metastatic disease appears applicable to iGBC as well. This systematic review examines the current evidence supporting or refuting neoadjuvant therapy and discusses criteria for selecting patients who would derive significant benefit, along with proposing an optimal chemotherapy regimen for iGBC patients. Improved outcomes have been reported in patients undergoing reoperation after 4 to 14 weeks following the initial cholecystectomy compared to immediate reoperation. Limited, yet promising, evidence supports the use of 3 to 4 cycles of gemcitabine-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to reoperative surgery in select high-risk iGBC cases.

Indexed as

CholecystectomyDrug therapyGallbladder neoplasmsNeoadjuvant therapyRadiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID40064481
PMCPMC12093237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.