Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40064189›Full record

SynthesisThe Lancet. Global health2025

Global and regional causes of maternal deaths 2009-20: a WHO systematic analysis.

Jenny A Cresswell, Monica Alexander, Michael Y C Chong, Heather M Link, Marija Pejchinovska, Ursula Gazeley, Sahar M A Ahmed, Doris Chou, Ann-Beth Moller, Daniel Simpson and 7 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Lancet. Global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 213 papers, 13 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
213citing papers in PubMed, 13 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

213 citing papers in PubMed, 13 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Model Development on Adherence to Aspirin in Pregnancy: A Co-Produced Qualitative Systematic Review and Meta-Ethnography.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Trial
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Validation of the fullPIERS model for predicting severe maternal outcomes in preeclampsia in five Brazilian centers.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

153 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Jenny A CresswellUNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development, and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland. Electronic address: cresswellj@who.int.
Monica AlexanderDepartment of Statistical Sciences, University of Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Sociology, University of Toronto, ON, Canada.
Michael Y C ChongDepartment of Statistical Sciences, University of Toronto, ON, Canada.
Heather M LinkKaleida Health, Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Marija PejchinovskaDepartment of Statistical Sciences, University of Toronto, ON, Canada.
Ursula GazeleyDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology and International Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Sahar M A AhmedUNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development, and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland.
Doris ChouUNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development, and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland.
Ann-Beth MollerUNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development, and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland.
Daniel SimpsonDepartment of Econometrics and Business Statistics, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Leontine AlkemaDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, USA.
Gemma VillanuevaCochrane Response, Cochrane, London, UK.
Yanina SguasseroCochrane Response, Cochrane, London, UK.
Özge TunçalpUNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development, and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland.
Qian LongGlobal Health Research Center, Duke Kunshan University, Kunshan, China.
Shaoming XiaoGlobal Health Research Center, Duke Kunshan University, Kunshan, China; School of Health Humanities, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Lale SayUNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development, and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMaternal mortality is not on track to meet Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) target 3.1 of a global maternal mortality ratio below 70 per 100 000 livebirths by 2030. Updated evidence on causes of death is needed to accelerate progress.

methodsWe conducted a multi-strategy systematic review to identify causes of maternal deaths occurring in 2009-20. Data sources included civil registration and vital statistics systems data from the WHO Mortality Database, reports published by Member States, and national and subnational journal articles identified via bibliographic databases. We used a Bayesian hierarchical model to estimate the maternal cause of death distribution by SDG regions and worldwide. Given the paucity of data on maternal suicide and late maternal deaths occurring beyond 42 days postpartum, additional analyses were conducted to estimate the proportion of maternal deaths from suicide and the ratio of maternal to late maternal deaths (all cause).

findingsGlobally, the most common cause of maternal death was haemorrhage (27%; 80% uncertainty interval 22-32), followed by indirect obstetric deaths (23%, 18-30), and hypertensive disorders (16%, 14-19). The proportion of haemorrhage deaths varied substantially by region and was highest in sub-Saharan Africa and Western Asia and Northern Africa. The proportion of maternal deaths from hypertensive disorders was highest in Latin America and the Caribbean. Most maternal deaths from haemorrhage and sepsis occurred during the postpartum period. Only 12 countries recorded one or more maternal suicides; of those countries, the proportion of deaths from suicide ranged from below 1% to 26% of maternal deaths. For countries reporting at least one late maternal death (ie, deaths that occur more than 42 days but less than 1 year after the termination of pregnancy), the ratio of late maternal deaths to maternal deaths up to 42 days ranged from <0·01 to 0·07.

interpretationHaemorrhage remains the leading cause of death, despite the existence of effective clinical interventions, emphasising the need for improved access to quality health care. The timing of most deaths in the postpartum period demands renewed commitment to improving the provision of postpartum care in addition to intrapartum care. Indirect causes of death require health system approaches to integrate obstetric and non-obstetric care.

fundingUSAID; US Fund for UNICEF via the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation; and UNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development, and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP).

Indexed as

Global HealthMaternal DeathMaternal MortalityBayes TheoremCause of DeathFemaleHumansPregnancyWorld Health Organization

Identifiers

PMID40064189
PMCPMC11946934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.