ArticleJournal of neurosurgery. Case lessons2025
Iatrogenic intracranial venous hypertension treated with intracranial venous stenting: illustrative case.
Article in Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVenous sinus injury resulting in thrombosis is a possible complication of skull base surgery and neck dissection. Although usually asymptomatic, sinus thrombosis can obstruct the dominant cranial venous outflow pathways, leading to a cycle of increased intracranial pressure secondary to venous congestion, which further compresses the remaining sinuses in a positive feedback loop. This can present with symptoms resembling idiopathic intracranial hypertension. OBSERVATIONS: A patient underwent a left mastoidectomy for chronic mastoiditis, complicated by injury of the ipsilateral dominant sigmoid sinus, with subsequent thrombosis. The patient developed chronic severe headaches, papilledema, visual blurring, and tinnitus. Angiography revealed a contralateral arachnoid granulation causing stenosis of the remaining venous outflow tract with a pressure gradient of 18 mm Hg. Transverse sinus stenting led to normalization of the gradient and resolution of symptoms. LESSONS: Injury of a dominant cranial venous outflow pathway led to a feedback loop that caused increased intracranial pressures and worsening contralateral transverse sinus stenosis, which was successfully treated using transverse sinus stenting. Venous congestive physiology leading to intracranial hypertension is underrecognized as a complication of venous injury in skull base surgery and responds to stenting if the patient's symptoms are refractory to conservative management or anticoagulation. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE24781.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.