Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40063941›Full record

ArticleJMIR infodemiology2025

Beliefs in Misinformation About COVID-19 and the Russian Invasion of Ukraine Are Linked: Evidence From a Nationally Representative Survey Study.

Dominika Grygarová, Marek Havlík, Petr Adámek, Jiří Horáček, Veronika Juríčková, Jaroslav Hlinka, Ladislav Kesner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR infodemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Susceptibility to Disinformation: A Data-Driven Typology Based on COVID-19 Hoaxes and Pro-Russian Propaganda.International journal of psychology : Journal international de psychologie · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dominika GrygarováCenter for Advanced Studies of Brain and Consciousness, National Institute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-2883-4712
Marek HavlíkCenter for Advanced Studies of Brain and Consciousness, National Institute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-7451-4173
Petr AdámekCenter for Advanced Studies of Brain and Consciousness, National Institute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-7787-0755
Jiří HoráčekCenter for Advanced Studies of Brain and Consciousness, National Institute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-0114-7306
Veronika JuríčkováCenter for Advanced Studies of Brain and Consciousness, National Institute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-6618-9799
Jaroslav HlinkaCenter for Advanced Studies of Brain and Consciousness, National Institute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-1402-1470
Ladislav KesnerCenter for Advanced Studies of Brain and Consciousness, National Institute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-8277-9705

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDetrimental effects of misinformation were observed during the COVID-19 pandemic. Presently, amid Russia's military aggression in Ukraine, another wave of misinformation is spreading on the web and impacting our daily lives, with many citizens and politicians embracing Russian propaganda narratives. Despite the lack of an objective connection between these 2 societal issues, anecdotal observations suggest that supporters of misinformation regarding COVID-19 (BM-C) have also adopted misinformation about the war in Ukraine (BM-U) while sharing similar media use patterns and political attitudes.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to determine whether there is a link between respondents' endorsement of the 2 sets of misinformation narratives, and whether some of the selected factors (media use, political trust, vaccine hesitancy, and belief rigidity) are associated with both BM-C and BM-U.

methodsWe conducted a survey on a nationally representative sample of 1623 individuals in the Czech Republic. Spearman correlation analysis was performed to identify the relationship between BM-C and BM-U. In addition, multiple linear regression was used to determine associations between the examined factors and both sets of misinformation.

resultsWe discovered that BM-C and BM-U were moderately correlated (Spearman ρ=0.57; P<.001). Furthermore, increased trust in Russia and decreased trust in the local government, public media, and Western allies of the Czech Republic predicted both BM-C and BM-U. Media use indicating frustration with and avoidance of public or mainstream media, consumption of alternative information sources, and participation in web-based discussions indicative of epistemic bubbles predicted beliefs in misinformation narratives. COVID-19 vaccine refusal predicted only BM-C but not BM-U. However, vaccine refusers were overrepresented in the BM-U supporters (64/161, 39.8%) and undecided (128/505, 25.3%) individuals. Both beliefs were associated with belief rigidity.

conclusionsOur study provides empirical evidence that supporters of COVID-19 misinformation were susceptible to ideological misinformation aligning with Russian propaganda. Supporters of both sets of misinformation narratives were primarily linked by their shared trust or distrust in the same geopolitical actors and their distrust in the local government.

Indexed as

CommunicationCOVID-19AdolescentAdultFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsPoliticsRussiaSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesTrustUkraineassociationbeliefbelief rigiditycorrelationcorrelation analysisCOVIDCOVID-19digital mediafalsehealth informationmediamisinformationnationalnewspoliticalpolitical trustpropagandapublic healthpublic opinionquestionnairesurveytrustvaccine hesitancywarwar in Ukraine

Identifiers

PMID40063941
PMCPMC11956375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.