Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40063938›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2025

Indigenous Community Views of Disability in Canada: Protocol for a Scoping Review.

Andrés Rojas-Cárdenas, Shaun Cleaver, Ivan Sarmiento, Julie Rock, Yan Grenier, Francis Charrier, Rose-Anne Gosselin, Anne Cockcroft, Neil Andersson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Andrés Rojas-Cárdenas *CIET-PRAM, Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1381-6634
Shaun Cleaver *École de readaptation, Faculté de médecine et des sciences de la santé, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9615-0665
Ivan Sarmiento *CIET-PRAM, Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2871-1464
Julie Rock *Département de psychoéducation et travail social, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, Canada.ORCID 0009-0006-9431-7747
Yan Grenier *Faculté des sciences sociales, École de travail social et de criminologie, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0372-5106
Francis Charrier *Centre interdisciplinaire de recherche en réadaptation et intégration social, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.ORCID 0009-0006-7789-9642
Rose-Anne Gosselin *First Nations Human Resources Development Commission of Quebec, Kahnawake, QC, Canada.ORCID 0009-0001-1301-9056
Anne Cockcroft *CIET-PRAM, Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1558-1106
Neil Andersson *CIET-PRAM, Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1121-6918

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndigenous people do not necessarily view disability in the same way as do other groups. Indigenous concepts of disability are connected to their ancestral history, cultural customs, and environmental context. Some Indigenous languages do not contain a word equivalent to disability. Western approaches to disability seldom reflect the voices of Indigenous people.

objectiveThe objective of this scoping review is to collate the perspectives, concepts, and understandings of disability in Indigenous communities in Canada and to map the factors that influence social approaches to disability from an Indigenous perspective.

methodsFollowing the methodological framework for scoping reviews of Arksey and O'Malley, we will search electronic databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, EBSCOhost ProQuest, Autochtonia, and APA PsycINFO. We will search gray literature through the Google search engine, conference abstracts, dissertation databases, government documents, and Indigenous organization websites. We will include quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods studies in English and French. The included studies will describe Indigenous approaches to disability, as they are understood based on personal, cultural, and historical contexts. Two reviewers will use Covidence software (Cochrane) to remove duplicates, screen articles, record the step-by-step selection process, and extract data from the included articles. We will follow the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines. We will present the findings in tables, charts, narrative summaries, and through fuzzy cognitive mapping. We will contextualize the literature's findings by comparing them with the stakeholders in Quebec and provide a discussion to explore potential solutions for the identified factors.

resultsAn initial limited search was conducted in January 2024. The study will be conducted in 2025. Publication of the results is expected in late 2025.

conclusionsWe anticipate that the findings from the scoping review will be useful for professionals, researchers, policy makers, and Indigenous communities themselves interested in co-designing and implementing evidence-informed disability programs and services, which will prevent mismatches between the programs and the sociocultural context. We will disseminate the results of this review through workshops with the participating communities, direct engagement with relevant local stakeholders, and through conference presentations and publications in scientific journals.

trial registrationOSF Registries osf.io/9rzkx; https://osf.io/9rzkx. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/57590.

Indexed as

Persons with DisabilitiesCanadaHumansResearch DesignScoping Reviews as Topiccultural safetydisabilityIndigenous healthintercultural dialogtraditional medicine

Identifiers

PMID40063938
PMCPMC11933751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.