Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40063928›Full record

ArticleJMIR human factors2025

Benefits and Barriers to mHealth in Hypertension Care: Qualitative Study With German Health Care Professionals.

Susann May, Felix Muehlensiepen, Eileen Wengemuth, Frances Seifert, Martin Heinze, Dunja Bruch, Sebastian Spethmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR human factors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Susann MayBrandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Center for Health Services Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, Rüdersdorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3847-4861
Felix MuehlensiepenBrandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Center for Health Services Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, Rüdersdorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8571-7286
Eileen WengemuthBrandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Center for Health Services Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, Rüdersdorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8213-2426
Frances SeifertBrandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Center for Health Services Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, Rüdersdorf, Germany.ORCID 0009-0005-9067-4459
Martin HeinzeBrandenburg Medical School, Immanuel Hospital Rüdersdorf, University Clinic for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Rüdersdorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3645-1033
Dunja BruchBrandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart Center Brandenburg, Faculty of Health Sciences, Bernau, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9511-8487
Sebastian SpethmannDeutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0987-8007

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDigital health technologies, particularly mobile health (mHealth) apps and wearable devices, have emerged as crucial assets in the battle against hypertension. By enabling lifestyle modifications, facilitating home blood pressure monitoring, and promoting treatment adherence, these technologies have significantly enhanced hypertension treatment.

objectiveThis study aims to explore the perspectives of health care professionals (HCPs) regarding the perceived benefits and barriers associated with the integration of mHealth apps into routine hypertension care. Additionally, strategies for overcoming these barriers will be identified.

methodsThrough qualitative analysis via semistructured interviews, general practitioners (n=10), cardiologists (n=14), and nurses (n=3) were purposefully selected between October 2022 and March 2023. Verbatim transcripts were analyzed using qualitative content analysis.

resultsThe results unveiled 3 overarching themes highlighting the benefits of mHealth apps in hypertension care from the perspective of HCPs. First, these technologies possess the potential to enhance patient safety by facilitating continuous monitoring and early detection of abnormalities. Second, they can empower patients, fostering autonomy in managing their health conditions, thereby promoting active participation in their care. Lastly, mHealth apps may provide valuable support to medical care by offering real-time data that aids in decision-making and treatment adjustments. Despite these benefits, the study identified several barriers hindering the seamless integration of mHealth apps into hypertension care. Challenges predominantly revolved around data management, communication contexts, daily routines, and system handling. HCPs underscored the necessity for structural and procedural modifications in their daily practices to effectively address these challenges.

conclusionsIn conclusion, the effective usage of digital tools such as mHealth apps necessitates overcoming various obstacles. This entails meeting the information needs of both HCPs and patients, tackling interoperability issues to ensure seamless data exchange between different systems, clarifying uncertainties surrounding reimbursement policies, and establishing the specific clinical benefits of these technologies. Active engagement of users throughout the design and implementation phases is crucial for ensuring the usability and acceptance of mHealth apps. Moreover, enhancing knowledge accessibility through the provision of easily understandable information about mHealth apps is essential for eliminating barriers and fostering their widespread adoption in hypertension care.

trial registrationGerman Clinical Trials Register DRKS00029761; https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00029761. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.3389/fcvm.2022.1089968.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelHealth PersonnelHypertensionTelemedicineAdultFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedMobile ApplicationsQualitative Researchblood pressure monitoringcardiologistsdigital healthgeneral practitionersGermanyHCPhealth care professionalhypertensionmHealthmHealth appsnursesphysiciansqualitative content analysisqualitative interviewsqualitative study

Identifiers

PMID40063928
PMCPMC11933770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.