ArticlePloS one2025
Efficacy of home-based and inpatient treatment for children and adolescents in psychiatric crisis: A systematic review protocol.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Intensive community and home-based treatments for eating disorders: a scoping review.Journal of eating disorders · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeChildren and adolescents experiencing psychiatric crises often undergo inpatient treatment, which may limit family involvement, stigmatize young individuals, and impede the application of therapeutic outcomes in their daily lives. This situation can result in increased rates of rehospitalization, the development of chronic conditions, and prolonged hospital stays. Home-based treatment represents a potential alternative to traditional inpatient care. The objective of the planned systematic review is to provide a comprehensive comparison of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of inpatient and home-based treatment modalities, with a particular focus on primary outcome parameters such as psychopathology, family functioning, and social functioning. Furthermore, secondary outcomes, including rates of relapses and rehospitalizations, will be evaluated.
methodsThe systematic search will be conducted using Medline, Embase, PsycInfo and Cochrane databases, following the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). The included studies will undergo a rigorous quality assessment using the Cochrane Risk of Bias (RoB2) tool for randomized trials and the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies - of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool for non-randomized studies. Where appropriate, data will be synthesized by meta-analysis using R-Studio and supplemented by sensitivity analyses to assess the robustness of the results. The overall quality of the evidence is assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. DISCUSSION: The planned systematic literature review will provide a synthesis of the current state of research on the comparative effectiveness of both treatment modalities. The objective is to furnish information for the delivery of effective patient care that also represents a cost-efficient solution for the healthcare system. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: This review protocol has been registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) under the registration number CRD42023458888.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.