ArticlePloS one2025
Analysing how AI-powered chatbots influence destination decisions.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The impact of AI chatbot service quality on consumer purchase intention: the cognitive and affective mediating mechanisms.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Relational intelligence in AI chatbots: Examining the trust-engagement-emotion-social presence model using PLS-SEM and fsQCA.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to explore the role of destination chatbots as innovative tools in travel planning, focusing on their ability to enhance user experiences and influence decision-making processes. Based on the Technology Acceptance Model, Enterprise Content Management, and Information Systems Security models, the study examines the psychological, emotional, and technological factors that drive user satisfaction, continued use, and intention to visit a destination. Understanding these factors is crucial for improving chatbot design and optimizing their implementation in the tourism industry. A total of 312 responses were collected from university students who regularly engage in tourism-related activities. The survey employed a structured questionnaire with items measuring information quality, user satisfaction, perceived enjoyment, usefulness, and behavioral intentions using a 7-point Likert scale. Structural equation modelling [SEM] was used to analyze the relationships between constructs, allowing us to evaluate the validity and reliability of the model. The results reveal that information quality positively enhances user satisfaction, perceived enjoyment, and perceived usefulness. Moreover, perceived enjoyment and usefulness are critical psychological and emotional drivers influencing users' decision to continue utilizing chatbots. Additionally, the analysis highlights the intention to continue using destination chatbots as a strong predictor of tourists' intention to visit the destination. The findings contribute to the theoretical understanding of technology acceptance and user behavior in tourism, while providing practical insights for destination managers and developers to enhance chatbot features and improve traveler engagement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.