SynthesisInternational journal of radiation biology2025
Biological effects of high-LET irradiation on the circulatory system.
Synthesis in International journal of radiation biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Responses of the carotid artery to acute, fractionated or chronic ionizing irradiation, and differences from the aorta.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Inverse dose protraction effects of high-LET radiation: Evidence and significance.Mutation research. Reviews in mutation researchReview
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedCorrection.2025
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeHigh-linear energy transfer (LET) radiation is generally thought to be more biologically effective in various tissues than low-LET radiation, but whether this also applies to the circulatory system remains unclear. We therefore reviewed biological studies about the effects of high-LET radiation on the circulatory system.
conclusionsWe identified 76 relevant papers (24 in vitro, 2 ex vivo, 51 in vivo, one overlapping). In vitro studies used human, bovine, porcine or chick vascular endothelial cells or cardiomyocytes, while ex vivo studies used porcine hearts. In vivo studies used mice, rats, rabbits, dogs or pigs. The types of high-LET radiation used were neutrons, α particles, heavy ions and negative pions. Most studies used a single dose, although some investigated fractionation effects. Twenty-one studies estimated the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) that ranged from 0.1 to 130, depending on radiation quality and endpoint. A meta-analysis of 6 in vitro and 8 in vivo studies (selected based on the feasibility of estimating the RBE and its uncertainty) suggested an RBE of 6.69 (95% confidence intervals (CI): 2.51, 10.88) for in vitro studies and 1.14 (95% CI: 0.91, 1.37) for in vivo studies. The meta-analysis of these 14 studies yielded an RBE of 2.88 (95% CI: 1.52, 4.25). This suggests that high-LET radiation is only slightly more effective than low-LET radiation, although substantial inter-study heterogeneity complicates interpretation. Therapeutic effects have also been reported in disease models. Further research is needed to better understand the effects on the cardiovascular system and to improve radiation protection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.