SynthesisNutrition reviews2025
Effect of Increasing Red Meat Intake on Iron Status in Adults with Normal and Suboptimal Iron Status: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis of Intervention Studies.
Synthesis in Nutrition reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Energy restriction and iron supplementation improve iron status in women with obesity regardless of red meat consumption: a randomized controlled trial.Scientific reports · 2026Trial
- Micronutrient risk with GLP-1 receptor and dual incretin agonists in obesity: Mechanistic pathways, clinical signals, and a monitoring framework.Obesity pillars · 2026Review
- Iron Balance and Cardiovascular Health: The Double-Edged Role of Deficiency and Overload.Cardiovascular toxicology · 2026Review
- Nutritional Value of Meat and Meat Products and Their Role in Human Health-2nd Edition.Nutrients · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
contextIron deficiency is the most prevalent nutrient deficiency globally. There is increasing interest in the use of food-based approaches for improving and maintaining iron status.
objectiveA systematic literature review was conducted to identify, critically-appraise, and meta-analyze data from intervention studies that investigated the effect of increasing red meat intake on iron status in adults. DATA EXTRACTION: The search was conducted using the PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane, SPORTDiscus, and Google Scholar databases, as well as other supplementary search strategies up to October 2024. Inclusion criteria for reviewed articles were participants who were adults aged 18 to 70 years, interventions that involved ≥4 weeks of increased red meat intake, included a suitable control condition, and measured at least 1 biomarker of iron status. The initial search yielded 5212 articles, with 10 articles (n = 397 participants) meeting the inclusion criteria. DATA ANALYSIS: The effect of intervention on markers of iron status were analyzed using a meta-analytic multivariate model, and the potential moderating effect of multiple variables were considered. The final meta-analysis included 42 effects (k) for serum ferritin (k = 25) and hemoglobin (Hb; k = 17) concentrations. Interventions involving increasing red meat intake had no significant effect on serum ferritin concentrations (raw mean change difference [RMCD] = 1.87 μg L-1; 95% CI, -0.73 to 4.48; t = 1.619; P = .139) but did have a positive effect on Hb concentrations (RMCD = 2.36 g L-1; 95% CI, 0.71 to 4.02; t = 3.297; P = .011). Moderator analysis revealed a positive effect of increasing red meat intake on serum ferritin concentrations when the intervention lasted at least 8 weeks (RMCD = 2.27 μg L-1; 95% CI, 0.87 to 3.67), and longer than 16 weeks (RMCD = 5.62 μg L-1; 95% CI, 0.67 to 10.6).
conclusionsIncreasing red meat intake can improve iron status as indicated by increases in serum ferritin and Hb concentrations, but the extent to which such increases are clinically meaningful remains to be established. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration No. CRD42023479349.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.