ArticlePloS one2025
Prediction of porosity, hardness and surface roughness in additive manufactured AlSi10Mg samples.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Metal Additive Manufacturing: Applications in Design, Process Modeling, Monitoring, and Quality Optimization.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Laser Wire Directed Energy Deposition of 5356 Aluminum Alloy: Process Parameter Optimization and Porosity Prediction.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Edge-focused wire arc additive manufacturing: Method development with ANN-based stress-strain and mass-efficiency.PloS one · 2026Article
- The Influence of Model Orientation on the Surface Roughness of Polymeric Models Produced by FFF, mSLA, PJ, and SLS Methods.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Multi-Source Porosity Image Normalization (NMI) in Selective Laser Melting for Reliable Reuse of Heterogeneous Microstructural Data.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Prediction and optimization of hardness in AlSi10Mg alloy produced by laser powder bed fusion using statistical and machine learning approaches.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite the advantages of additive manufacturing, its widespread adoption is still hindered by the poor quality of the fabricated parts. Advanced machine learning techniques to predict part quality can improve repeatability and open additive manufacturing to various industries. This study aims to accurately predict the relative density, surface roughness and hardness of AlSi10Mg samples produced by selective laser melting regarding process parameters such as scan speed, layer thickness, laser power, and hatch distance. For this purpose, data including porosity, surface hardness, and roughness were extracted from the literature, and additional measurements were performed on additive manufactured samples in the current work. This work compares five supervised machine learning algorithms, including artificial neural networks, support vector regression, kernel ridge regression, random forest, and Lasso regression. These models are evaluated based on the coefficient of determination and the mean squared error. On the basis of the computational results, the artificial neural network outperformed in predicting relative density, surface roughness, and hardness. Feature importance analysis on the compiled dataset using ANN revealed that laser power and scan speed are the most important features affecting relative density (e.g., porosity) and hardness, while scan speed and layer thickness significantly impact the surface roughness of the parts. The study identified an optimal laser power and scan speed region that achieves a relative density > 99%, surface roughness < 10 µm, and hardness > 120 HV. The results presented in this study provide significant advantages for additive manufacturing, potentially reducing experimentation costs by identifying the process parameters that optimize the quality of the fabricated parts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.