ArticlePloS one2025
Leveraging time for better impulse control: Longer intervals help ADHD children inhibit impulsive responses.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intertemporal Decision-Making Ability in Patients with Chronic Diseases: A Concept Analysis.Patient preference and adherence · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Children diagnosed with an Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) often exhibit impulsivity and timing difficulties. Here, we investigated whether children (mean age = 9.9 years) with combined type ADHD, comprising both hyperactive-impulsive and inattentive symptoms, could use the temporal predictability of an event to help inhibit impulsive behaviour. In an adapted Simon task, we measured the effects of temporal predictability on the speed and accuracy of choice reaction times (RT) to targets appearing after short or long intervals. Temporally predictive information was conveyed either explicitly (visual cues) or implicitly (cue-target interval). Analysis of RT distributions allowed us to decompose impulsive behaviour into two key elements: the initial urge to react impulsively, and the subsequent ability to inhibit any impulsive erroneous behaviour. Both healthy controls and ADHD children could use temporal predictability conveyed by temporal cues and the length of the trial to speed their RT. However, in healthy children both explicit and implicit temporal predictability impaired inhibition of impulsive responses. In turn, although children with ADHD had stronger tendency for impulsive responding and abnormal patterns of inhibition as compared to controls, the temporal predictability of the target did not exacerbate these effects. Indeed, responding to targets appearing after long, rather than short, intervals improved inhibition in ADHD children. Taken together, our results suggest that children with ADHD can make use of longer preparatory intervals to help inhibit impulsive behaviour.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.