Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40063607›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2025

Response to pembrolizumab in advanced prostate cancer with predictive biomarkers.

Nicole J Altomare, Yutai Li, Clayton Neill, Maha Hussain, David J VanderWeele

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nicole J AltomareDepartment of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, United States.
Yutai LiDepartment of Urology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, United States.
Clayton NeillDepartment of Urology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, United States.
Maha HussainDepartment of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, United States.
David J VanderWeeleDepartment of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4576-5034

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Checkpoint inhibitors targeting PD-1/PD-L1, such as pembrolizumab, can be effective in a small population of biomarker-selected patients with metastatic prostate cancer (mPC), as has been demonstrated by small case series. The objective of this study is to help identify which biomarker-selected patients are most likely to benefit from pembrolizumab and estimate their likelihood of response. This is a single-center study in which we analyzed clinical data of 18 patients with mPC who were treated with pembrolizumab for a biomarker-driven indication. We found that 38.9% of patients showed a 50% or greater decline in PSA, all of whom had high microsatellite instability (MSI-H). One patient with MSI-H and high tumor mutation burden (TMB-H) had 100% decline in PSA and remained on pembrolizumab after 47 months. Neither MSI-H nor TMB-H, however, was sufficient for response. These results support biomarker testing for all patients with mPC and use of immunotherapy in select populations.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalBiomarkers, TumorProstatic NeoplasmsAgedAged, 80 and overHumansMaleMicrosatellite InstabilityMiddle AgedAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalBiomarkers, Tumorpembrolizumabbiomarkersimmunotherapymetastatic prostate cancermicrosatellite instabilitypembrolizumab

Identifiers

PMID40063607
PMCPMC11892552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.