Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40063583›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Multimodal prehabilitation in people awaiting acute inpatient cardiac surgery: Study protocol for a pilot feasibility trial (PreP-ACe).

Sarah Raut, Aaron Hales, Maureen Twiddy, Lili Dixon, Dumbor Ngaage, David Yates, Gerard Danjoux, Lee Ingle

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06275100 (PREhabilitation in Patients Awaiting Acute Inpatient Cardiac SurgEry), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06275100 naunknown statusnot on this map

PREhabilitation in Patients Awaiting Acute Inpatient Cardiac SurgEry

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of HullRan2024 to 2025Enrolled20ConditionsCardiac Disease, Aortic Valve Disease, Coronary Artery Disease, EndocarditisArmsPrehabilitation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Personalized prehabilitation: a health promotion tool to improve surgical outcomes.Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sarah RautHull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4983-9435
Aaron HalesHull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull, United Kingdom.
Maureen TwiddyHull and York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, United Kingdom.
Lili DixonHull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull, United Kingdom.
Dumbor NgaageHull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull, United Kingdom.
David YatesYork and Scarborough Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, York, United Kingdom.
Gerard DanjouxNorth Yorkshire Academic Alliance of Perioperative Medicine, North Yorkshire, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2057-0396
Lee IngleFaculty of Health Sciences, School of Sport, Exercise & Rehabilitation Science, University of Hull, Hull, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe concept of "prehabilitation," or optimising individual physical and mental wellbeing prior to surgery is well established in cancer and orthopaedic populations. However, amongst the cardiac surgery population, the concept is relatively new. Of the few studies available, all focus on the elective surgical population. This pilot feasibility trial is novel as it will focus on the impact of multimodal prehabilitation on the acute inpatient cardiac surgical population.

methodsThis single centre, prospective, single arm pilot feasibility trial will recruit 20 inpatients awaiting cardiac surgery. Measurements will be collected at the start of the trial (baseline), 7 days after intervention, and 14 days after the intervention or before the day of surgery. The primary outcome measure will be feasibility and practicality of the programme in an acute inpatient population. We will be looking into participant eligibility, acceptability, recruitment rates, completion rates and barriers to implementing a prehabilitation programme. Secondary outcomes include incidence of study-related adverse events, improvement in 6 minutes walk test (6MWT), hand grip strength, quality of life, anxiety scores and spirometry. At the end of the trial, we will be seeking the feedback of the participants on key components of the programme to help us inform future work. We hypothesise that light to moderate structured exercise training is low risk and feasible in patients awaiting inpatient cardiac surgery. The study was approved by Health Research Authority and Heath and Care Research Wales (Yorkshire & the Humber- Bradford Leeds Research Ethics Committee: REC reference 23/YH/0255) on the 8th November 2023. DISCUSSION: Multimodal prehabilitation could improve individual physical and mental wellbeing whilst awaiting inpatient cardiac surgery. Prehabilitation can provide individuals with a sense of ownership and control over their condition, improve their motivation and independence, and enhance their mental and physical recovery after surgery. Traditionally, patients waiting for cardiac surgery are discouraged from physical activity/ structured exercise training and receive limited information regarding their health. Appropriate physical and psychological support could improve their confidence to mobilise sooner after surgery. This may then facilitate earlier discharge leading to improved hospital bed utilisation and patient flow.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT06275100.

Indexed as

Cardiac Surgical ProceduresPreoperative CarePreoperative ExerciseAdultAgedFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansInpatientsMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID40063583
PMCPMC11892877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.