Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40063576›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Evaluation of a digital entomological surveillance planning tool for malaria vector control: Three country mixed methods pilot study.

Charlotte Hemingway, Steven Gowelo, Mercy Opiyo, Dulcisaria Marrenjo, Mara Maquina, Blessings N Kaunda-Khangamwa, Lusungu Kayira, Teklu Cherkose, Yohannes Hailemichael, Neusa Torres and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Charlotte HemingwayDepartment of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8993-3795
Steven GoweloMalaria Elimination Initiative, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9501-578X
Mercy OpiyoMalaria Elimination Initiative, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Dulcisaria MarrenjoPrograma Nacional de Controlo da Malária, Maputo, Mozambique.
Mara MaquinaCentro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça, Mozambique.
Blessings N Kaunda-KhangamwaMalaria Alert Centre, Communicable Diseases Action Centre, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi.
Lusungu KayiraMalaria Alert Centre, Communicable Diseases Action Centre, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi.
Teklu CherkoseArmauer Hansen Research InstituteAddis Ababa, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0003-2344-5435
Yohannes HailemichaelArmauer Hansen Research InstituteAddis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Neusa TorresCentro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça, Mozambique.
Estevao MucaveleCentro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça, Mozambique.
Muanacha MintadeCentro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça, Mozambique.
Baltazar CandrinhoPrograma Nacional de Controlo da Malária, Maputo, Mozambique.
Themba MzilahowaMalaria Alert Centre, Communicable Diseases Action Centre, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi.
Endalamaw GadisaArmauer Hansen Research InstituteAddis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Allison TatarskyMalaria Elimination Initiative, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Élodie A VajdaMalaria Elimination Initiative, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Emily DantzerMalaria Elimination Initiative, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Edward ThomsenMalaria Elimination Initiative, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Michael ColemanDepartment of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Neil F LoboDepartment of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.

Funding

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation INV-024346
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVector control remains the principal method to prevent malaria transmission and has led to significant reductions in malaria incidence across endemic regions. However, such gains have stagnated, underscoring the need to tailor vector control to local drivers of transmission. An Entomological Surveillance Planning Tool (ESPT) was designed to translate normative guidance into an operational tool that supports cost effective, locally tailored, and evidence-based vector control. To facilitate ESPT implementation, an interactive digital toolkit (eSPT) was created to support question-based surveillance planning.

methodsThe eSPT was evaluated with 49 target users in Ethiopia, Malawi, and Mozambique. The eSPT was introduced to participants through facilitated workshops. A mixed-methods design was employed, combining pre- and post-intervention surveys with qualitative measures to assess the impact of the eSPT on knowledge, self-efficacy and work practices related to entomological surveillance planning. Qualitative methods were used to explore the acceptability and utility of the eSPT.

resultsQuantitative measures showed that the facilitated eSPT workshop increased participants' knowledge and self-efficacy in question-based entomological surveillance planning. Target users responded positively to the eSPT, reporting high usability scores and satisfaction with the interface. Respondents from academic institutes, central government and international NGOs reported the eSPT to be a useful training tool and believed it could provide substantial efficiencies in the planning process. Further user testing, customizability and compatibility with mobile devices was recommended to enhance the eSPT's usefulness as a planning tool, especially at the local government level.

conclusionsInteractive digital toolkits could be an engaging, efficient, and accessible way to build research and surveillance capacity within relevant organizations and local authorities. This is achieved by combining tailored information and guidance, with functions that enable the development of a planning document, in an easy-to-follow stepwise process. To maximize the usability and usefulness of these toolkits, target users must be centered in the design.

Indexed as

MalariaMosquito ControlMosquito VectorsAnimalsAnophelesEthiopiaHumansMalawiMozambiquePilot Projects

Identifiers

PMID40063576
PMCPMC11892875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.