Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40063509›Full record

Observational studyCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2025

Racial Differences in Colorectal Adenomas at Screening Colonoscopy in the United States.

Yuqi Wu, Piet C de Groen, Nabil Natafgi, Chao Cai, Dezhi Wu, Sudha Xirasagar

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yuqi WuDepartment of Health Services Policy and Management, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina.ORCID 0009-0006-7532-030X
Piet C de GroenDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0002-2560-1254
Nabil NatafgiDepartment of Health Services Policy and Management, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina.ORCID 0000-0003-4979-0317
Chao CaiClinical Pharmacy and Outcomes Sciences, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-5919-4976
Dezhi WuDepartment of Integrated Information Technology, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-3554-1136
Sudha XirasagarDepartment of Health Services Policy and Management, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-9722-454X

Funding

REAL-TIME FEEDBACK TO IMPROVE COLONOSCOPYR01DK106130 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI DE GROEN, PIET C · 2016 to 2019
$2.8M
Reducing Colorectal Cancer Disparities: Racial Differences in Colorectal Polyp ProfileR21CA202477 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI XIRASAGAR, SUDHA · 2016 to 2017
$461k
Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute (DCP, NCI) R21CA202477National Cancer Institute (National Institutes of Health) R21CA202477National Institute of Diabetes Digestive and Kidney Diseases (National Institutes of Health) R01DK106130National Institutes of Health (NIH) R01DK106130NCI NIH HHS R21 CA202477NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK106130
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBlack Americans experience a higher incidence of colorectal cancer than Whites despite undergoing prevention screenings similar to those of Whites since 2010. We compared the colorectal adenoma status of Black and White patients at screening colonoscopy, a measure of colorectal cancer risk.

methodsUsing cross-sectional, observational data, we studied colorectal adenomas at first-time screening colonoscopy in average-risk patients aged 40 to 89 years, screened between September 2001 and July 2016 in South Carolina. We analyzed the age-adjusted odds of Black men and women (vs. White) having adenomas, advanced adenomas, ≥3 nonadvanced adenomas, and right hyperplastic polyps, and compared their total polyp burden (the sum of the diameters of all adenomas and right polyps detected).

resultsAmong 28,100 patients (58.4% Black and 53.8% women), we found that Black patients had lower age- and gender-adjusted odds than White patients of having adenoma (OR = 0.88, P < 0.01) and right hyperplastic polyp (OR = 0.74, P < 0.01), with a similar pattern within gender groups. Black and White patients were similar about advanced adenoma and 3+ nonadvanced adenoma. Among patients with lesions, mean polyp burden ranged from 8.5 mm (±7.2) for Black women aged 40 to 49 years to 12.3 mm (±7.4) for Black men aged more than 70 years. Age-adjusted polyp burden was 0.4 mm higher for Black men than for White men and 0.3 mm lower for Black women than for White women patient groups (P < 0.01).

conclusionsIn a large, racially balanced patient sample, Black and White patients showed similar polyp profiles. IMPACT: Given similar adenoma status, other evidence-supported clinical factors associated with suboptimal polyp detection should be explored to understand the continuing colorectal cancer disparities affecting Black Americans.

Indexed as

AdenomaColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBlack or African AmericanCross-Sectional StudiesEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSouth CarolinaUnited StatesWhite

Identifiers

PMID40063509
PMCPMC12048223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.