Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40063328›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2025

Broad-spectrum antimicrobial properties of linalool: supporting its pharmacological use in chronic wound infections by pathogens within the ESKAPE group and polymicrobial biofilms.

Akshatha Rai, Yuvarajan Subramaniyan, Fida Fathima, Punchappady Devasya Rekha

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Akshatha RaiDivision of Microbiology and Biotechnology, Yenepoya Research Centre, Yenepoya (Deemed to be University), University Road, Deralakatte, Mangalore, 575018, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-4966-285X
Yuvarajan SubramaniyanDivision of Microbiology and Biotechnology, Yenepoya Research Centre, Yenepoya (Deemed to be University), University Road, Deralakatte, Mangalore, 575018, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1172-0938
Fida FathimaDivision of Microbiology and Biotechnology, Yenepoya Research Centre, Yenepoya (Deemed to be University), University Road, Deralakatte, Mangalore, 575018, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7407-4913
Punchappady Devasya RekhaDivision of Microbiology and Biotechnology, Yenepoya Research Centre, Yenepoya (Deemed to be University), University Road, Deralakatte, Mangalore, 575018, India. rekhapd@yenepoya.edu.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9187-6395

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic wound infections are caused by biofilm forming opportunistic pathogenic bacteria. The persistence of infection, co-infecting pathogens and prolonged use of antibiotics promote antibiotic resistance hampering healing process due to increased inflammation. Hence, we tested the broad range antibacterial activity of linalool, a bioactive monoterpene commonly present in many essential oils having anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial activities to target different opportunistic pathogens commonly found in the chronic wound. We included some of the common pathogens such as Acinetobacter baumannii, Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalis, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus aureus, to study the broad range antimicrobial efficacy of linalool. The in vitro effect of linalool on biofilm was quantified in pre-treatment, post-treatment, repetitive treatment, and polymicrobial biofilm scenarios. Time-kill and XTT (2,3-bis [2-methyloxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl]-2 H-tetrazolium-5-carboxanilide) assays were performed to confirm the efficacy of linalool against wound infections, and these results were further validated using simulated wound exudates medium (WEM) which mimics the wound environment. The mechanism of bactericidal action was determined using assays for membrane integrity and oxidative stress. The results indicated the broad range antimicrobial activity of linalool with minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ranging from 2.5 to 5 µL/mL against E. coli, A. baumannii, E. faecalis, S. aureus, and K. pneumoniae, while for P. aeruginosa the MIC was 20 µL/mL. Linalool was most effective against E. coli, E. faecalis, K. pneumoniae, A. baumannii, and S. aureus, and could inhibit the growth and biofilm by more than 90% and 80%, respectively, at 5 µL/mL. The XTT assay confirmed the MIC results, showing a significant reduction in the metabolic activity of the pathogens (p < 0.001). In the simulated WEM similar response of the bacteria to linalool treatment was observed. At 5 to 20 µL/mL concentrations, linalool significantly inhibited the polymicrobial biofilm consisting of P. aeruginosa, A. baumannii, and S. aureus in two species combinations. The mechanism of bactericidal action was associated with the increased reactive oxygen species production and disruption in the membrane integrity leading to release of cellular content. The anti-inflammatory activity of linalool, assessed using the albumin denaturation method showed significant activity at the tested concentrations. In conclusion, the findings suggest the therapeutic potential of linalool in treating biofilm associated chronic wound infections due to its versatile broad spectrum activity.

Indexed as

Acyclic MonoterpenesAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaBiofilmsWound InfectionHumansKlebsiella pneumoniaeMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPseudomonas aeruginosaReactive Oxygen SpeciesStaphylococcus aureusAcyclic MonoterpenesAnti-Bacterial AgentslinaloolReactive Oxygen SpeciesAntibacterial activityAnti-inflammatoryEssential oilMembrane permeabilityPolymicrobial biofilmReactive oxygen species

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.