ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2025
Barriers and Facilitators to Cross-Institutional Referrals: System Configuration Analysis of VA Staff Experiences.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn 2014 and 2018, respectively, Congress passed the Veterans Access, Choice, and Accountability Act (Choice Act) and the Maintaining Internal Systems and Strengthening Integrated Outside Networks Act (MISSION Act), which expanded eligibility for and use of cross-institutional referrals among U.S. Veterans enrolled in the Veterans Health Administration.
objectiveTo identify facilitators and barriers to patient information sharing for cross-institutional, outpatient referrals resulting from policy changes.
designApplying the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) 2.0 framework, we conducted work system and configural analyses of semi-structured interviews.
participantsClinical and administrative staff in six Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) facility community care liaison program offices. APPROACH: Interviews focused on barriers and facilitators to sharing patients' information across healthcare institutions. Transcripts were summarized by domain and coded to consensus, followed by directed content analysis and visualization using configural diagrams. KEY
resultsFrom 19 interviews, we characterized a nine-step, ad hoc referral process. Barriers were reported in four of nine referral steps: scheduling, coordination, sending of pre-visit clinical records, and receipt of post-visit records. Low adoption of new technology, strained relationships with CCN clinicians, and inconsistent policies were commonly reported barriers. Largely, perceived barriers were classified as technology, people, or organization factors. The COVID-19 pandemic and a transition between third-party administrators were reported as notable environment factors.
conclusionsVA staff perceived increases in patient care delays and staff workload associated with social and technical barriers to sharing patients' information across healthcare institutions. In the cross-institutional referral process, we identified the primary configuration or combination of work system factors-technology, people, and organization- related to prevalent barriers. System-level interventions are needed to enhance relationships with clinicians across healthcare institutions, implement policies that guide patient information exchange, and design supportive technologies for efficient clinician communication during cross-institutional referrals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.