ReviewJournal of racial and ethnic health disparities2026
Health Implications of Colorism: A Narrative Review of the Literature.
Review in Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Uncovering multilevel drivers of cancer disparities among Latinos in the United States.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Advancing Birth Equity Through Quality Improvement Education: The SPEAK UP Champion Course.Health equityArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colorism, first conceptualized by writer and activist Alice Walker in 1982, is a byproduct of racism that refers to discrimination based on skin tone, hair texture, and facial features. Although less studied than race-based discrimination-which typically involves negative attitudes and unfair treatment of individuals based on their racial identity, usually propagated between racial and ethnic groups-colorism is a critical area of research that provides insight into health disparities occurring within racial and ethnic groups. This narrative literature review assesses the extent to which colorism's impact on global health outcomes has been studied. Skin pigmentation, determined by melanin, evolved as a protective adaption to environments with high levels of ultraviolet radiation. However, skin color is rarely contextualized or applied using its evolutionary meaning; instead, it often serves as a basis for social stratification. Individuals with darker skin tones frequently face discrimination in their healthcare that contributes to significant health disparities, particularly in fields such as dermatology. Additionally, the societal preference for lighter skin has fueled the widespread use of skin-lightening products, which carry serious health risks. The majority of studies examining colorism and health outcomes are concentrated in the United States and Latin America, limiting our ability to accurately assess color-based health disparities in regions such as Asia, Africa, Australia, and Europe. While most existing studies identify skin color as a significant predictor of health, others report no consistent associations. This conflicting evidence signals the need for more comprehensive studies to explore the underlying mechanisms, such as perceived discrimination and socioeconomic status, that influence health outcomes for individuals with darker skin. We also find that current dermatological education does not sufficiently prepare students to diagnose skin conditions in patients with darker skin tones, leading to reduced diagnostic accuracy and worse health outcomes compared to lighter-skinned patients. Finally, we identify the need for more longitudinal studies on the health effects of skin bleaching, and more cross-country comparisons to differentiate between country-specific and universal trends in health outcomes among those who use skin-lightening products.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40063294What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.