SynthesisNeurosurgical review2025
Effect of the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in patients undergoing elective craniotomies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Effect of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols on mortality and morbidity after trauma and non-trauma emergency laparotomies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Updates in surgery · 2026Pooled it
- The effects of preoperative carbohydrate loading on postoperative outcomes in neurosurgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC anesthesiology · 2025Pooled it
- Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) for elective glioma craniotomy: a propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study.Neurosurgical review · 2026Article
- Review
- Article
- Enhanced recovery after neurosurgery: a narrative review comparing clinical outcomes, protocols, and challenges with standard postoperative care.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Review
- Different titration protocols in pain management after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer patients.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Enhanced recovery after surgery protocol (ERASP) improves postoperative outcomes. However, its implementation in neurosurgery remains under explored, resulting in the absence of standard evidence-based guidelines. Thus, we compared the outcomes of ERASP and conventional perioperative care (CPC) in patients undergoing elective craniotomy for various intracranial pathologies. This systematic review and meta-analysis involved the search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar until December 4, 2024. The primary outcomes were total and postoperative length of stay (LOS). Secondary outcomes included hospitalization cost, pain, analgesic use, Karnofsky performance status (KPS) score, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), postoperative complications, 30-days readmission and reoperation, and mortality. A total of 15 studies, including randomized controlled trials (n = 9) as well as prospective and retrospective studies (each n = 3) were included. Compared to CPC, ERASP significantly reduced total LOS (MD -3.32, 95%CI -3.66 to -2.98; P < 0.0001, I
Indexed as
Identifiers
40063290What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.